> Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>
> >Welcome to the 21st century, where computers can't even
> unambiguously
> >represent written text.
> >
> >
> Isn't this something unicode was meant to solve?
Yes, and if implemented properly, it mostly does.
> or does
> unicode still need a codepage to map t
> Hmm...interesting. Not entirely sure what the implications
> of what you are saying are (as I don't really understand codepages).
>
> Does a codepage represent a character with 16 bits? or 8?
> Could you recommend a book or a URL on the subject? Maybe I
> should look at this when I have mo
2 matches
Mail list logo
