Re: No subjects are nice

2002-11-14 Thread Randall R Schulz
Jake, [ In case you've unsubscribed, Jake, I'm sending you a copy directly. ] I don't think you should just go away. It is most certainly _not_ the case that you aren't welcome here. Over a few years of history on this list, I can only think of one person who was truly unwelcome (and was banned

Re: No subjects are nice

2002-11-14 Thread Jake D. Stern
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:35:49PM -0500, CBFalconer wrote: [..snip..] Apparently, you missed my thanks, apology and explanation. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-11/msg00685.html Automated responses that indicate a problem with "something in the subject line" are not crystal clear. My impressio

Re: No subjects are nice

2002-11-14 Thread Soren A
[cgf, please don't read this. I can't easily send email privately to this bloke tonight or I'd do this off-list. last contrib. by me to this thread] On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:35:49 GMT, CBFalconer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:3DD2E1D5.AEB1557A@;yahoo.com: > It would be much easier if the vari

Re: No subjects are nice

2002-11-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:35:49PM -0500, CBFalconer wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:38:56PM -0800, Jake D. Stern wrote: >> >> > [This is a bug report, I'm following cygwin reporting instructions >> > by posting here. The subject line has been changed so as to not >

Re: No subjects are nice

2002-11-13 Thread CBFalconer
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:38:56PM -0800, Jake D. Stern wrote: > > > [This is a bug report, I'm following cygwin reporting instructions > > by posting here. The subject line has been changed so as to not > > be refused. Original subject line: "xterm consumes 100% cpu wh