On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:50:35PM +0100, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
>>Sorry, but it is not. When an emulation environment does not properly
>>emulate Windows and causes a problem with a program, then it is not the
>>program's fault.
>
>I agree with you, but in that case, setup.exe wouldn't have fu
> Sorry, but it is not. When an emulation environment
> does not properly
> emulate Windows and causes a problem with a program,
> then it is
> not the program's fault.
I agree with you, but in that case, setup.exe wouldn't
have function by the past ...
> I really don't understand this line of t
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 03:07:55PM +0100, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
>Seriously, Trying to run cygwin under WINE environment is a good
>testcase for both power companies (ie cygwin and wine :)).
Sorry, but it is not. When an emulation environment does not properly
emulate Windows and causes a prob
I resent this due to a small problem with the spam
filters. Thanks for your support.
--- Sylvain Petreolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:43:19 +0100 (CET)
---
Hi all,
Thanks for the analogy with the toaster :).
> -Original Message-
> From: Hack Kampbjørn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 1:13 AM
> Next verify that downgrading to a "stable" cygwin dll will
> fix it, so search for that good old copy of cygwin B20 (B19
> will also do here). This takes some time includ
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 02:15:46PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >If setup.exe is doing something that shouldn't work on win9x->XP but
> >that does.. then we've discovered another MS bug to add to the
> >bug-compatible checklist. However I suspect we've just found a
Hallo !
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 02:15:46PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >If setup.exe is doing something that shouldn't work on win9x->XP but
> >that does.. then we've discovered another MS bug to add to the
> >bug-compatible checklist. Howev
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 02:15:46PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>If setup.exe is doing something that shouldn't work on win9x->XP but
>that does.. then we've discovered another MS bug to add to the
>bug-compatible checklist. However I suspect we've just found a hole in
>WINE.
Why do I have a feel
> -Original Message-
> From: Sylvain Petreolle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: wineu
> Subject: New version of setup.exe broken when running with WINE
>
>
> Hi,
>
> When run with WINE
Hi,
When run with WINE,
setup.exe 2.194.2.15 displays stranges characters in
the window title (non-blocking problem),
but stops function after choosing the mirror. (the
only one that appears is the last used when running
the previous version).
A subwindow is apparently tried to be open.
I have
10 matches
Mail list logo
