On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Robert Pendell wrote:
> Right. Windows actually stole certain things from UNIX. Example: The
> system32\drivers\etc folder is taken directly from UNIX. There are
> certain others stolen from UNIX too but I can't remember what.
``Stolen'' is a big word. Microsoft has as muc
Robert Pendell wrote:
Yes. That is true. Microsoft is showing some changes though for the
future. For example. Even in Windows XP, LAN connections are
firewalled by default. SP2 will enable the firewall by default and
include a security center. The firewall is more robust giving the user
a bit
ntivirus.
>
> Ah duh! That's still Outlook!
>
> > Its coming from someone on [EMAIL PROTECTED] And [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> So what?!? You do realize that email addresses can easily be forged
> don't you?
>
> > I'm not affected by this virus. I just scanne
utlook!
>
> > Its coming from someone on [EMAIL PROTECTED] And [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> So what?!? You do realize that email addresses can easily be forged
> don't you?
>
> > I'm not affected by this virus. I just scanned my computer, and netsky
> > worm is
don't you?
I'm not affected by this virus. I just scanned my computer, and netsky
worm is not there, nor is any other virus.
Then you are lucky. If I say Outlook and Outlook Express are known to
help proliferate virii and worms that does not necessarily translate to
"anybody w
Ok. Let's stop talking about this now.
It was a temporary glitch. Hoping that would be obvious given the
amount of spam/viruses that actually makes it through here is probably
way too much to ask.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://c
It's not Ourlook or Ourlook Express.
I use outlook xp with a firewall and an antivirus.
Its coming from someone on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not affected by this virus. I just scanned my computer, and netsky worm
is not there, nor is any other virus.
Linux is being hit
Chris Taylor wrote:
On Wed, June 30, 2004 7:47 pm, Andrew DeFaria said:
phil wrote:
can whoever maintains this list ensure that virus definitions are up
to date.
I have had 3 and as I write 5 instances of the above.
be on guard
How about switching to something other than the virus propagating MS
On Wed, June 30, 2004 7:47 pm, Andrew DeFaria said:
> phil wrote:
>
>> can whoever maintains this list ensure that virus definitions are up to
>> date.
>>
>> I have had 3 and as I write 5 instances of the above.
>>
>>
>> be on guard
>
> How about switching to something other than the virus pr
phil wrote:
can whoever maintains this list ensure that virus definitions are up
to date.
I have had 3 and as I write 5 instances of the above.
be on guard
How about switching to something other than the virus propagating MS
software (i.e. Outlook and Outlook Express)?
--
There cannot be a crisi
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, phil wrote:
> can whoever maintains this list ensure that virus definitions are up to
> date.
>
> I have had 3 and as I write 5 instances of the above.
>
> be on guard
> Regards
> Phil
Phil,
There are spam/virus filters, and there are messages with spoofed e-mail
addresses t
can whoever maintains this list ensure that virus definitions are up to
date.
I have had 3 and as I write 5 instances of the above.
be on guard
Regards
Phil
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentatio
12 matches
Mail list logo