Randall R Schulz wrote:
> Max,
>
>
> At 08:30 2003-02-26, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:15:23PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
You obviously weren't thinking when you wrote this.
>>>
>>> Here's YA catchphrase for the cygwin mailing list... :-)
>>
Max,
At 08:30 2003-02-26, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:15:23PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> You obviously weren't thinking when you wrote this.
>
> Here's YA catchphrase for the cygwin mailing list... :-)
"YOWTWYWT"? Hmm... catchy! :-)
Pronounced "yo
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:15:23PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >> You obviously weren't thinking when you wrote this.
> >
> > Here's YA catchphrase for the cygwin mailing list... :-)
>
> "YOWTWYWT"? Hmm... catchy! :-)
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:15:23PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> You obviously weren't thinking when you wrote this.
>
> Here's YA catchphrase for the cygwin mailing list... :-)
"YOWTWYWT"? Hmm... catchy! :-)
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsu
* Christopher Faylor (03-02-26 15:59 +0100)
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:48:39PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>>* Christopher Faylor (03-02-26 04:35 +0100)
>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:11:36AM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
* Max Bowsher (03-02-25 20:13 +0100)
> Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:15:23PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>You obviously weren't thinking when you wrote this.
Here's YA catchphrase for the cygwin mailing list... :-)
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Do
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> I don't know these reasons for all those Base packages. But the
> reasons are in my opinion not trivial. Omitting tar for example hasn't
> simply the effect "so you cannot use tar" but "so you cannot install
> via setup.exe, because the installation packages are tarred (and
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:48:39PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>* Christopher Faylor (03-02-26 04:35 +0100)
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:11:36AM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>>> * Max Bowsher (03-02-25 20:13 +0100)
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> I checked it myself and I was wrong: the default
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 22:48, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> So you're telling me that
>
> a) there is no particular reason why the Cygwin creators made a "Base
> Category" (different to all other categories (Editors, Shells))
There was a very long discussion on the cygwin-apps list about the
categorie
* Christopher Faylor (03-02-26 04:35 +0100)
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:11:36AM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>> * Max Bowsher (03-02-25 20:13 +0100)
>>> Thorsten Kampe wrote:
I checked it myself and I was wrong: the default install is exactly the
base install (plus dependencies) and this
Thorsten Kampe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But I'm curious (and this question is often asked). Do you think
> something from the base install could be omitted /and/ having a
> working Cygwin install?
What is a working Cygwin install? If you leave out a package, the
programs in that package w
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:11:36AM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>* Max Bowsher (03-02-25 20:13 +0100)
>> Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>>>I checked it myself and I was wrong: the default install is exactly the
>>>base install (plus dependencies) and this is exactly the minimum
>>>install.
>>
>>For certain
* Max Bowsher (03-02-25 20:13 +0100)
> Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>> I checked it myself and I was wrong: the default install is exactly
>> the base install (plus dependencies) and this is exactly the minimum
>> install.
>
> For certain definitions of minimum.
Well, yes. I believe the Cygwin people ha
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> I checked it myself and I was wrong: the default install is exactly
> the base install (plus dependencies) and this is exactly the minimum
> install.
For certain definitions of minimum.
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reportin
* Max Bowsher (03-02-25 00:25 +0100)
> Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>> * Max Bowsher (03-02-24 23:50 +0100)
>>> Thorsten Kampe wrote:
* Charles Krug (03-02-24 23:38 +0100)
> We've built the gcc/as/ld toolset as a cross compiler to the
> Altavec PowerPC. We've been using it internally for a c
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:38:19PM -0500, Charles Krug wrote:
>We've built the gcc/as/ld toolset as a cross compiler to the Altavec
>PowerPC. We've been using it internally for a couple of weeks.
>
>Those of us with full developer Cygwin installations can run the program
>with no problems.
>
>We'd
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Max Bowsher (03-02-24 23:50 +0100)
>> Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>>> * Charles Krug (03-02-24 23:38 +0100)
We've built the gcc/as/ld toolset as a cross compiler to the
Altavec PowerPC. We've been using it internally for a couple of
weeks.
Those of us w
* Max Bowsher (03-02-24 23:50 +0100)
> Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>> * Charles Krug (03-02-24 23:38 +0100)
>>> We've built the gcc/as/ld toolset as a cross compiler to the Altavec
>>> PowerPC. We've been using it internally for a couple of weeks.
>>>
>>> Those of us with full developer Cygwin installat
Charles Krug wrote:
> Cygwinners:
>
> We've built the gcc/as/ld toolset as a cross compiler to the Altavec
> PowerPC. We've been using it internally for a couple of weeks.
>
> Those of us with full developer Cygwin installations can run the
> program with no problems.
>
> We'd like to be able to d
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Charles Krug (03-02-24 23:38 +0100)
>> We've built the gcc/as/ld toolset as a cross compiler to the Altavec
>> PowerPC. We've been using it internally for a couple of weeks.
>>
>> Those of us with full developer Cygwin installations can run the
>> program with no problems
* Charles Krug (03-02-24 23:38 +0100)
> Cygwinners:
Yeah, that's me!
> We've built the gcc/as/ld toolset as a cross compiler to the Altavec
> PowerPC. We've been using it internally for a couple of weeks.
>
> Those of us with full developer Cygwin installations can run the program
> with no pr
Cygwinners:
We've built the gcc/as/ld toolset as a cross compiler to the Altavec
PowerPC. We've been using it internally for a couple of weeks.
Those of us with full developer Cygwin installations can run the program
with no problems.
We'd like to be able to distribute a minimal package to ever
22 matches
Mail list logo
