Re: Managed mounts and .exe files (Was Re: cp, install, and the .exe extension)

2004-02-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 21 23:07, Robert R Schneck wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FWIW, WinNT/2k/XP allow executables to not have a .exe extension. > > I wasn't aware of it, and haven't been able to figure it out in a couple > of minutes of playing around and Googling. How? On NT, the

Re: Managed mounts and .exe files (Was Re: cp, install, and the .exe extension)

2004-02-21 Thread Robert R Schneck
Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Robert R Schneck-McConnell wrote: >> Hey, it might be interesting for managed mounts *really* to identify the >> filenames "foo" and "foo.exe". (Maybe they already do?) > > Huh? What do you mean by "identify" here? If you mean "

Managed mounts and .exe files (Was Re: cp, install, and the .exe extension)

2004-02-21 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Robert R Schneck-McConnell wrote: > [snip] > Hey, it might be interesting for managed mounts *really* to identify the > filenames "foo" and "foo.exe". (Maybe they already do?) > > Robert Huh? What do you mean by "identify" here? If you mean "equate", this most likely won't