Rob,
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:29:49PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 08:10:50AM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> > > > do they have INT's
> > > > (Import Name Tables?) that are fully valid (no auto-import tricks etc
> > > > etc)?
>
> I'm afraid not, see below.
Doh! I'm me
Rob,
[Sorry for the sluggish response time...]
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 08:10:50AM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> > > do they have INT's
> > > (Import Name Tables?) that are fully valid (no auto-import tricks etc
> > > etc)?
I'm afraid not, see below.
> > I believe so, but how do I check for sur
> > do they have INT's
> > (Import Name Tables?) that are fully valid (no auto-import tricks etc
> > etc)?
>
> I believe so, but how do I check for sure? I perused the output of
> "objdump -p". Should I have done something else?
with objdump -x ...
Standard import table are identified by two p
Rob,
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 04:11:45AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> the files that don't link being rebound...
Do you mean "rebase" instead of "rebound" above?
> do they have INT's
> (Import Name Tables?) that are fully valid (no auto-import tricks etc
> etc)?
I believe so, but how do
Jason,
the files that don't link being rebound... do they have INT's
(Import Name Tables?) that are fully valid (no auto-import tricks etc
etc)?
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:
5 matches
Mail list logo