Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 12 08:41, D. Boland wrote: > Jason Tishler wrote: > > > > Daniel, > > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Aug 9 22:41, D. Boland wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > To accomplished this, procmail would have to be modified slightly. > > > > From the Cyg

Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-11 Thread D. Boland
Jason Tishler wrote: > > Daniel, > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Aug 9 22:41, D. Boland wrote: > > > [snip] > > > To accomplished this, procmail would have to be modified slightly. > > > From the Cygwin website, I can see that procmail is maintained b

Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-11 Thread Jason Tishler
Daniel, On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 9 22:41, D. Boland wrote: > > [snip] > > To accomplished this, procmail would have to be modified slightly. > > From the Cygwin website, I can see that procmail is maintained bij > > Jason Tishler. > > > > I need

Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 9 22:41, D. Boland wrote: > Hi group, > > I have the Sendmail port ready. I will anounce my intent to package it > soon. > > There is one thing, though. Sendmail relies heavily on the procmail > program. The problem is that the procmail package as it is now, is not > "multiple root" aware

Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-09 Thread D. Boland
Hi group, I have the Sendmail port ready. I will anounce my intent to package it soon. There is one thing, though. Sendmail relies heavily on the procmail program. The problem is that the procmail package as it is now, is not "multiple root" aware. It also is not able to do suid at the moment.