Waldemar Rachwal gmail.com> writes:
>
> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> > Never mind. It was easier than I anticipated. I checked in a patch to
> > support reading Interix symlinks. However, this only works as expected
> > for relative symlinks, since absolute paths in Interix are
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> On Aug 26 21:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > It would be no big problem to support Interix
> > symlink R/O support as well. After all this time without Interix
> > symlink support, I don't think it's such a pressing problem, though.
> > I'll add it to
On Aug 26 21:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> It would be no big problem to support Interix
> symlink R/O support as well. After all this time without Interix
> symlink support, I don't think it's such a pressing problem, though.
> I'll add it to my TODO list for the time after 1.7.1 has been relea
On Aug 26 19:17, Waldemar Rachwal wrote:
> Cygwin 1.7 has *read* support of symlinks created by Vista+, but *no write*
> for
> reasonable reasons (http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00936.html).
>
> That's not bad, as working in dual-boot system, when it comes to switch to
> Linux, I woul
Cygwin 1.7 has *read* support of symlinks created by Vista+, but *no write* for
reasonable reasons (http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00936.html).
That's not bad, as working in dual-boot system, when it comes to switch to
Linux, I would convert all cygwin-like symlinks to NTFS's native sy
5 matches
Mail list logo
