Re: Graphical debugger over gdb (ddd/insight failed to build)

2003-03-21 Thread Fred Kulack
On 03/21/2003 at 04:08:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Call `insight'. That's the way it is in recent gdb versions. `gdb' is only the CLI. --- end of excerpt --- Ah beautiful. Thanks! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/

Re: Graphical debugger over gdb (ddd/insight failed to build)

2003-03-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 03:55:59PM -0600, Fred Kulack wrote: > > On 03/21/2003 at 08:50:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The > general release of gdb for cygwin contains (and has always contained) > insight. --- end of excerpt --- > > Hmmm. Since -w didn't work, I incorrectly assumed that feature

Re: Graphical debugger over gdb (ddd/insight failed to build)

2003-03-21 Thread Fred Kulack
On 03/21/2003 at 08:50:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The general release of gdb for cygwin contains (and has always contained) insight. --- end of excerpt --- Hmmm. Since -w didn't work, I incorrectly assumed that feature wasn't completed yet. Reran setup to validate that gdb was the newest ava

Re: Graphical debugger over gdb (ddd/insight failed to build)

2003-03-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 08:35:50AM -0600, Fred Kulack wrote: >What's the favorite graphical debugger that you use with cygwin? Is >there a binary distribution for it anywhere or a source distribution >that is 'more stable' for cygwin? > >I downloaded and tried to compile the source for both ddd an

Graphical debugger over gdb (ddd/insight failed to build)

2003-03-21 Thread Fred Kulack
What's the favorite graphical debugger that you use with cygwin? Is there a binary distribution for it anywhere or a source distribution that is 'more stable' for cygwin? I downloaded and tried to compile the source for both ddd and insight, but both failed for different reasons. I worked on them