I agree with your postion on calling a Linux system GNU/Linux. Have you
considered using the name GNU/Windows when refering to machines that use
the RedHat Cygwin UNIX envoroment?
No, because in that case the whole Windows system is still there.
GNU/Linux means "the GNU s
hello cgf,
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:22:19PM +0900, J. Grant wrote:
>
>>The idea was from a conversation I had with some co-workers, not
>>entirely seriously but thank you for your reply setting the facts
>>straight.
>>
>
> So, sending this email RMS was a joke, the
bscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
>Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>
Amen, but its not VI forever !! its Pico forever :) as for GNU/Windows
tha
Quoth JG:
> Hello RMS,
> I agree with your postion on calling a Linux system GNU/Linux. ...
I think we should all refer to his Stallman-ness, as "GNU/RMS". As for
Cygwin, I think the
RedHat representative said it best: It's their baby, so they get to name
it.
In the case of the Linux kernel,
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 10:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:22:19PM +0900, J. Grant wrote:
> >The idea was from a conversation I had with some co-workers, not
> >entirely seriously but thank you for your reply setting the facts
> >straight.
>
> So, sending this email RMS w
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:22:19PM +0900, J. Grant wrote:
>The idea was from a conversation I had with some co-workers, not
>entirely seriously but thank you for your reply setting the facts
>straight.
So, sending this email RMS was a joke, then? Are you guys personal
friends who enjoy a good la
On Monday 15 April 2002 04:22, J. Grant wrote:
> Hello cgf,
>
> The idea was from a conversation I had with some co-workers, not
> entirely seriously but thank you for your reply setting the facts straight.
>
> Windows has been established as a reasonable generic word IMO, with the
> Lindows case
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 01:12:56PM +0900, J. Grant wrote:
>
>>I agree with your postion on calling a Linux system GNU/Linux. Have you
>>considered using the name GNU/Windows when refering to machines that use
>>the RedHat Cygwin UNIX envoroment? This would be g
J. Grant wrote:
> I agree with your postion on calling a Linux system GNU/Linux. Have you
> considered using the name GNU/Windows when refering to machines that use
> the RedHat Cygwin UNIX envoroment?
(Debian) GNU/Linux is an Linux-Distribution using GNU-GPL. GNU/Windows
in analogy
if it was meant to be funny, it failed.
- if it wasn't meant to be funny, it failed.
Anyways... shouldn't it be GNU\Windows?
--
Ryan T. Sammartino
http://members.shaw.ca/ryants/
WHOA!! Ken and Barbie are having TOO MUCH FUN!! It must be the
NEGATIVE IONS!!
--
Unsubscribe
For the record, I assumed that JG was being sarcastic, because that idea sounded so
foreign to me.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: htt
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 01:12:56PM +0900, J. Grant wrote:
>I agree with your postion on calling a Linux system GNU/Linux. Have you
>considered using the name GNU/Windows when refering to machines that use
>the RedHat Cygwin UNIX envoroment? This would be good publicity for
>the GN
Hello RMS,
I agree with your postion on calling a Linux system GNU/Linux. Have you
considered using the name GNU/Windows when refering to machines that use
the RedHat Cygwin UNIX envoroment? This would be good publicity for
the GNU tools that are installed on Windows machines. Also it would
13 matches
Mail list logo
