Interesting that the package name isn't "libarchive" in the repos, but
it's "libarchive13". Since I'm using a apt-get bash script to get the
packages for me anyway. Since it seems I already had "libarchive13"
installed, I tried installing the mingw64 package to see if it would fix
my issue buil
starz0rdesign wrote:
Which package contains libink.a?
This is the output for make V=1
$ make V=1
make all-am
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/nobodyimportant/libarchive-3.3.1'
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wformat -Wformat-s
ecurity -no-undefined -version-info 1
Which package contains libink.a?
This is the output for make V=1
$ make V=1
make all-am
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/nobodyimportant/libarchive-3.3.1'
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wformat
-Wformat-s
ecurity -no-undefined -version-info 16:1:3 -o libarchive.
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:52 PM, starz0rdesign wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm having a bit of an issue trying to compile LibArchive 3.3.1 for Windows.
> I have Mingw64 with GCC7.1 installed to prevent the Cygwin installer from
> linking it's DLL.
Maybe you should ask on the Mingw mailing list.
> A
Hello.
I'm having a bit of an issue trying to compile LibArchive 3.3.1 for
Windows. I have Mingw64 with GCC7.1 installed to prevent the Cygwin
installer from linking it's DLL. At the end of the make process I seem
to get this error:
make all-am
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/nobodyimpor
2009/2/5 rajeevs:
> please go through the followings for the problem:
>
> 1) I want to create a 64 bit DLL using Cygwin in Windows Serever 2003
> 64 bit platform.
> 2) I am using Cygwin to run the make file
> 3) In the make file I have a macro "CFLAGS" where gave the option
> "-m64"
64
bit .SO file!!!
i tried alot but tillnow didn't get the solution.
Please suggest me some alternative options if anybody have.
Thanks in advance!
Rajeev
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/GCC-compiler--m64-option-in-cygwin-tp13503988p21850981.html
Sent from the Cygw
64
bit .SO file!!!
i tried alot but tillnow didn't get the solution.
Please suggest me some alternative options if anybody have.
Thanks in advance!
Rajeev
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/GCC-compiler--m64-option-in-cygwin-tp13503988p21850968.html
Sent from the Cygw
On 31 October 2007 13:19, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Dave Korn, le Wed 31 Oct 2007 12:52:18 -, a écrit :
>> On 31 October 2007 12:41, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Tim Prince, le Wed 31 Oct 2007 05:35:45 -0700, a écrit :
No, there is no 64-bit native support in cygwin. Even on linux, a
cr
Dave Korn, le Wed 31 Oct 2007 12:52:18 -, a écrit :
> On 31 October 2007 12:41, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Tim Prince, le Wed 31 Oct 2007 05:35:45 -0700, a écrit :
> >> No, there is no 64-bit native support in cygwin. Even on linux, a
> >> cross-gcc is needed to create 64-bit build on a 32-bit
On 31 October 2007 12:41, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tim Prince, le Wed 31 Oct 2007 05:35:45 -0700, a écrit :
>> No, there is no 64-bit native support in cygwin. Even on linux, a
>> cross-gcc is needed to create 64-bit build on a 32-bit system,
>
> Nope, gcc now has multi-lib support.
I
Hi,
Tim Prince, le Wed 31 Oct 2007 05:35:45 -0700, a écrit :
> No, there is no 64-bit native support in cygwin. Even on linux, a
> cross-gcc is needed to create 64-bit build on a 32-bit system,
Nope, gcc now has multi-lib support.
> and none of the required libraries or utilities are generally
anik pal wrote:
I have c source
code of a product which I build in solaris environment
with gcc compiler –m64 option to create 64 bit
executable in solaris 9 environment.
Now I’ve to do the same task for win environment,
because the library available for my client is in
windows environment
Hello,
Im quite new in cygwin environment. I have c source
code of a product which I build in solaris environment
with gcc compiler m64 option to create 64 bit
executable in solaris 9 environment.
Now Ive to do the same task for win environment,
because the library available for my client
On 23 July 2006 12:37, MariLiza Koukouli wrote:
>>> Does this mean anything to anyone?
>
>> It means that PBGroutines.c has failed to include
>> some vital header or
>> other. Whatever the word before "off64_t" on line 7 is, it should have
>> been defined and it hasn't been.
>
> Hi Dave,
> tha
>> Does this mean anything to anyone?
> It means that PBGroutines.c has failed to include
>some vital header or
>other. Whatever the word before "off64_t" on line 7
>is, it should have been
>defined and it hasn't been.
Hi Dave,
thanks for replying. I would agree with you on that
one, but then
On 21 July 2006 15:59, MariLiza Koukouli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using the CygWin environent, CYGWIN_NT-5.1, i.e.
> on Windows XP. I am trying to compile a piece of code
> that contains both F77 and C subroutines. G77 works
> fine and compiles without problems but GCC complains
> about somethin
Hi all,
I am using the CygWin environent, CYGWIN_NT-5.1, i.e.
on Windows XP. I am trying to compile a piece of code
that contains both F77 and C subroutines. G77 works
fine and compiles without problems but GCC complains
about something that means absolutely nothing to me.
I am using the followi
Thanks for the informative and helpful response.
Darel
---
Tim Prince wrote:
djh wrote:
My current version of gcc that setup.exe downloaded for me is:
gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special) (gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125)
The other day I downloaded gcc 4.0.2
filena
djh wrote:
My current version of gcc that setup.exe downloaded for me is:
gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special) (gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125)
The other day I downloaded gcc 4.0.2
filename: gcc-4.0.2.tar.bz2
did a configure, make, and makeinstall
and the build was successfull. I compiled a prog
My current version of gcc that setup.exe downloaded for me is:
gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special) (gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125)
The other day I downloaded gcc 4.0.2
filename: gcc-4.0.2.tar.bz2
did a configure, make, and makeinstall
and the build was successfull. I compiled a program with it
Original Message
>From: Julie Lee
>Sent: 04 August 2005 17:15
> Everything I find says to re-install or update. I don't know what else
> to do. Any help is welcomed.
You need to install or update. You just need to do it _right_, is all.
If you're seeing _getreent complaints, then you *
in. I've
installed just the base/default. Then went into the developers
packages and installed just the gcc C (3.4.4-1 gcc compiler) stuff
that I needed. I still get the same error. I'm running cygwin on a
windows XP computer. The last time I re-installed I deleted all files
having to do
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:05:24 -0500 (EST) Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, there's also apparently a cygwin port of 'script':
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01371.html
It's also easy to redirect STDOUT and STDERR to a file. I found myself
doing it often enough that I
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Michael A Chase wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:08:07 +0200 Ryan Budge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ive attached a screen cap of the window. Sorry... I don't have script
> > like I do in BSD to give the output in text. Or am I being silly...
>
> The latter. You can cut an
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:08:07 +0200 Ryan Budge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ive attached a screen cap of the window. Sorry... I don't have script
> like I do in BSD to give the output in text. Or am I being silly...
The latter. You can cut and paste text from a console window in by
pressing Alt-
Hi Tim.
> Your config.log appears to say that the test gcc command wants to link
> gainst libuser32, and it doesn't find that library. Does gcc -v work
for
> you from the command line? Do you have such a library?
> --
> Tim Prince
gcc -v does work from the command line.
Ive attached a scree
At 08:54 AM 12/6/2002, Tim Prince wrote:
>On Thursday 05 December 2002 23:28, Ryan Budge wrote:
> >
> > In my cvs directory I run :-
> >
> > %autoconf
> > %./configure
> >
> > And I get : -
> >
> > Configure : error : installation or configuration problem : c compiler
> > cannot create executables.
On Thursday 05 December 2002 23:28, Ryan Budge wrote:
>
> In my cvs directory I run :-
>
> %autoconf
> %./configure
>
> And I get : -
>
> Configure : error : installation or configuration problem : c compiler
> cannot create executables.
>
> Im attaching the output of cygcheck -c and config.log.
>
At 02:28 AM 12/6/2002, Ryan Budge wrote:
>Hello list.
>
>Im having some trouble getting gcc working. I am trying to compile the
>CVS for coldsync but it doesn't work. I have done the same procedures
>on my BSD 4.7 box and all works fine.
>
>I have :-
>
>Windows XP Pro.
>Cygwin 1.3.15-2
>G
Hello list.
Im having some trouble getting gcc working. I am trying to compile the
CVS for coldsync but it doesn't work. I have done the same procedures
on my BSD 4.7 box and all works fine.
I have :-
Windows XP Pro.
Cygwin 1.3.15-2
Gcc 3.2-3
And others..
In my cvs directory I run :-
Shuo Li wrote:
> >Hi Chris,
> >
> >I am interested in locating a version of gcc compiler that can generate
> >binary files for 64-bit Windows platform. Much like the first step you did
> >for cygwin project. Does such thing exist at all? If it does not exist, h
t the project web page.
For your convenience, I've reset the Reply-To: address to point to the
cygwin mailing list. I've also Cc'ed this reply there.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 04:00:28AM +, Shuo Li wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>I am interested in locating a version of gcc compiler tha
33 matches
Mail list logo
