Re: real native win32 binaries with gcc 4.x

I want to compile real native win32 executables with gcc >= 4.3.x? Does anybody has a small example makefile/prog, which demonstrates the use of the switches with gcc 4.x? The cross-compiler is not available as yet. It's still in the works. In the meantime, you can use 'gcc-3'

real native win32 binaries with gcc 4.x

gcc >= 4.3.x? Does anybody has a small example makefile/prog, which demonstrates the use of the switches with gcc 4.x? Thomas -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Uns

1.5.25-7: sh.exe crashes while building gcc.gnu.org svn for gcc 4.x

Hello cygwin, I still getting pretty bad thing from sh.exe, it frequently crashes on my system while building different versions of gcc 4.x. But now, after i have been tring to build *4.3* version, sh.exe begin crashes more frequently than ever before, so i thinks that is problem of

Re: GCC 4.x for cygwin

Roberto Bagnara wrote: > > Where can I find it? (From the installer it seems that > the latest available version is 3.4.4, but this is really > unusable for serious C++ development.) There's too much on this subject in the archives to be summarized. Why not look yourself? -- Unsubscribe info:

GCC 4.x for cygwin

Where can I find it? (From the installer it seems that the latest available version is 3.4.4, but this is really unusable for serious C++ development.) All the best, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.u

Re: gcc 4.x?

My apologies, I must have missed the latest one about GCC 4.2.0 RC3 for some reason, sorry. Tom wrote: There is an email thread from 2006 to this topic: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-03/msg00507.html I have compiled my own GCC 4.2.0 for cygwin, but not tested and not really used it a lot.

Re: gcc 4.x?

There is an email thread from 2006 to this topic: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-03/msg00507.html I have compiled my own GCC 4.2.0 for cygwin, but not tested and not really used it a lot. And I must admit that what Charles et al were talking about is not my core expertise. I would appreciat

gcc 4.x with libmudflap - is it possible on cygwin?

Good day. I trying to compile gcc (4.1.1 release and 4.2 from snapshot) and it's all ok, but i can't compile it with mudflap library: checking for the name of the symbol used for the entry point... unknown configure: error: none of the known symbol names works make[1]: *** [configure-target-libmud

gcc 4.x?

Just curious what the issues are that are holding up the release of a gcc 4.x package? Thanks, Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ

Re: GCC 4.x+

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 10:55:53PM -0800, Tim Prince wrote: >I've heard of some reluctance among gcc developers to continue support >for cygwin. There seems to be a lack of interest in problem solving, or >in overcoming the binutils bottleneck in the way of a 64-bit native >cygwin. Huh? Could

Re: GCC 4.x+

ng problems for both cygwin-special and mingw-special g++? Otherwise, if it's so simple, I don't understand why Gerrit hasn't released gcc-4.x as a test version, nor [OT:] why Danny hasn't released a gcc-4.0 candidate for mingw. We don't appear to have a full concen

Re: GCC 4.x+

t for 4.x AFAIK. On this issue though even the current 3.4 gcc packages are broken, so it wouldn't be a regression per se. > Otherwise, if it's so simple, I don't understand why Gerrit hasn't > released gcc-4.x as a test version, nor [OT:] why Danny hasn't released &g

Re: GCC 4.x+

cygwin-special and mingw-special g++? Otherwise, if it's so simple, I don't understand why Gerrit hasn't released gcc-4.x as a test version, nor [OT:] why Danny hasn't released a gcc-4.0 candidate for mingw. Other than "we're just mean". :-) I mean, hey, they&

Re: GCC 4.x+

Angelo Graziosi wrote: > > The dwarf2 EH is a lot faster too > > Does this mean to use: --with-dwarf2 option in 'configure'? No, that's setting the default debug symbol type to dwarf2 instead of stabs (I think). You get dwarf2 exception handling by default without having to specify anything un

Re: GCC 4.x+

Brian Dessent wrote: > The dwarf2 EH is a lot faster too Does this mean to use: --with-dwarf2 option in 'configure'? Thanks a lot, Angelo. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: ht

Re: GCC 4.x+

Angelo Graziosi wrote: > I have built GCC-3.4.6, 4.0.3, 4.1.0 in this way (using the Cygwin > GCC-3.4.4-1): > >./configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-3.4.6 (or 4.0.3, 4.1.0) >make >make install I like to use --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs because it seems cleaner and t

Re: GCC 4.x+

Brian Dessent wrote: > If you pick a proper --prefix (or use --program-suffix and > --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs) it will be completely separate > from the installed version of gcc, you can use the two side by side. I have built GCC-3.4.6, 4.0.3, 4.1.0 in this way (using the Cygwin GC

Re: GCC 4.x+

Václav Haisman wrote: > is there a plan to move Cygwin over to newer GCC? GCC 3.4.4 is getting > old. I could use the strictness of C++ compiler it brings. There's no reason why you can't build gcc 4.x on your own, it works fine in Cygwin. If you pick a proper --prefix (or use

GCC 4.x+

Hi, is there a plan to move Cygwin over to newer GCC? GCC 3.4.4 is getting old. I could use the strictness of C++ compiler it brings. Vaclav Haisman signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature