On Fri, 28 May 2004, mathias.wagner wrote:
> To: "Gerrit @ cygwin"
http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
> Meanwhile I have had some help from another colleague here at Philips and
> he found out that the -m96bit-long-double compile option works fine.
My understanding is t
To: "Gerrit @ cygwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Mathias Wagner/HBG/SC/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GCC 3.3.1 problem with printf %Lg %Lg and
-m128bit-long-double compile
option
Classification:
> On Thu, 27 May 2004, Ge
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Hallo mathias,
>
> > GCC 3.3.1 has a problem when printing multiple long double variables using
> > printf and the -m128bit-long-double compile option on a Pentium-based
> > machine.
>
> Seems to be a bug in gcc, for bug reporting instructions, please
Hallo mathias,
> GCC 3.3.1 has a problem when printing multiple long double variables using
> printf and the -m128bit-long-double compile option on a Pentium-based
> machine.
Seems to be a bug in gcc, for bug reporting instructions, please see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.
> compile the code
Hi all,
GCC 3.3.1 has a problem when printing multiple long double variables using
printf and the -m128bit-long-double compile option on a Pentium-based
machine.
compile the code below with
gcc -m128bit-long-double test.c
and with
gcc test.c
The later will print stuff correctly in bot
5 matches
Mail list logo