Re: I: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit

2005-04-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 29 16:20, Impagnatiello Fabrizio wrote: > Corinna, > > I tried 1.5.17 preview and it works! > > May be, could you increase the amount of allocatable memory from > 0x6000 up to 0x7000 in next official 1.5.17 ? Unfortunately not. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Ple

Re: I: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit

2005-04-29 Thread Impagnatiello Fabrizio
Corinna, I tried 1.5.17 preview and it works! May be, could you increase the amount of allocatable memory from 0x6000 up to 0x7000 in next official 1.5.17 ? In such a way the windows native data/program segments might be very similar. Thanks -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/

Re: I: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit

2005-04-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 29 10:39, Dave Korn wrote: > Original Message > >From: Corinna Vinschen > >Sent: 29 April 2005 09:28 > > > On Apr 27 17:19, Impagnatiello Fabrizio wrote: > >> again > >> > >> -Messaggio originale- > >> Da: Impagnatiello Fabrizio > >> Inviato: mercoledì 27 aprile 2005 17.15

RE: I: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit

2005-04-29 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Corinna Vinschen >Sent: 29 April 2005 09:28 > On Apr 27 17:19, Impagnatiello Fabrizio wrote: >> again >> >> -Messaggio originale- >> Da: Impagnatiello Fabrizio >> Inviato: mercoledì 27 aprile 2005 17.15 >> No error message, just exit. >> >> After investig

Re: I: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit

2005-04-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 27 17:19, Impagnatiello Fabrizio wrote: > again >   > -Messaggio originale- > Da: Impagnatiello Fabrizio > Inviato: mercoledì 27 aprile 2005 17.15 > A: 'cygwin@cygwin.com' > Oggetto: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit >   > Starting from 1.5.1

Re: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit

2005-04-27 Thread Larry Hall
At 04:44 PM 4/27/2005, you wrote: >Larry Hall wrote: >>Mark Hadfield wrote: >>>It's interesting to have this pinned down to the transition from >>>1.5.12 to 1.5.13. I have half a mind (but only half) to try and >>>verify this. >>Can anybody spare Mark half a mind so he get up to a full one? ;-) >

Re: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit

2005-04-27 Thread Mark Hadfield
Larry Hall wrote: Mark Hadfield wrote: It's interesting to have this pinned down to the transition from >>1.5.12 to 1.5.13. I have half a mind (but only half) to try and >>verify this. Can anybody spare Mark half a mind so he get up to a full one? ;-) I think what I really need is a round tuit. Th

Re: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit

2005-04-27 Thread Larry Hall
At 03:51 PM 4/27/2005, you wrote: >Dave Korn wrote: >>>From: Impagnatiello Fabrizio >>>Sent: 27 April 2005 16:20 >>>Starting from 1.5.13 (14 and 15 subversions are the same) I experienced >>>all FOTRAN written programs using large arrays to crash. >>>No error message, just exit. >>> >>>After inves

Re: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit

2005-04-27 Thread Mark Hadfield
Dave Korn wrote: From: Impagnatiello Fabrizio Sent: 27 April 2005 16:20 Starting from 1.5.13 (14 and 15 subversions are the same) I experienced all FOTRAN written programs using large arrays to crash. No error message, just exit. After investigation (WEB/mailing list) and testing programs I disco

RE: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit

2005-04-27 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Impagnatiello Fabrizio >Sent: 27 April 2005 16:20 Please, Fabrizio, no more offlist mail! It should be obvious from the conversation in the web archive that I don't use fortran, so just because I can speculate about the reasons based on what goes on in equivalent

I: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit

2005-04-27 Thread Impagnatiello Fabrizio
again   -Messaggio originale- Da: Impagnatiello Fabrizio Inviato: mercoledì 27 aprile 2005 17.15 A: 'cygwin@cygwin.com' Oggetto: G77 160 MB memory allocation limit   Starting from 1.5.13 (14 and 15 subversions are the same) I experienced all FOTRAN written programs using large