On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 03:46:17PM -0400, bob wrote:
>The astute reader might be asking why RDWR and not RDONLY.
This astute reader is asking why you are starting a new thread every
time. Please stick to one.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: h
Forgot to mention in my last code snip post that the Linux code below is the
"desired" behavior of the fifos to match the existing Linux code in the SIMPL
toolkit.
In this Linux code snip we open the receive end of the fifo as RDWR (without
the O_NONBLOCK flag) and Linux conveniently allow
I'm on the mailing list in digest mode, so this response may not get
threaded correctly.
Here is some basic test code which illustrates all the things I spoke about in
my previous note. The Cygwin machine and the Linux machine are identical (I
have a harddrive swap system).Notice that t
On 10/3/2012 6:02 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:58:55AM -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
On 10/2/2012 5:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
FYI, a quick scan seems to show that you've pretty much undone a lot of
what I've recently added for fifos so I don't expect to real
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:29:21AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:15 PM, bob wrote:
>>While this hack works the performance under Cygwin is orders of
>>magnitude slower than the equivalent Linux performance.
>>
>>Any suggestions on how we can achieve a higher performance blocki
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:58:55AM -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
>On 10/2/2012 5:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:45:08PM -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
>>>On 10/2/2012 1:19 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:15:37PM -0400, bob wrote:
>
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:15 PM, bob wrote:
> While this hack works the performance under Cygwin is orders of
> magnitude slower than the equivalent Linux performance.
>
> Any suggestions on how we can achieve a higher performance blocking read on a
> Cygwin RDWR fifo?
>
You expect too much, it is
On 10/2/2012 5:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:45:08PM -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
On 10/2/2012 1:19 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:15:37PM -0400, bob wrote:
Any suggestions on how we can achieve a higher performance blocking read on a
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:45:08PM -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
>On 10/2/2012 1:19 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:15:37PM -0400, bob wrote:
>>> Any suggestions on how we can achieve a higher performance blocking read on
>>> a
>>> Cygwin RDWR fifo?
>>
>> As always, i
On 10/2/2012 1:19 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:15:37PM -0400, bob wrote:
Any suggestions on how we can achieve a higher performance blocking read on a
Cygwin RDWR fifo?
As always, if you can provide test cases of bugs we will endeavor to fix
problems.
I didn't th
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:15:37PM -0400, bob wrote:
>Any suggestions on how we can achieve a higher performance blocking read on a
>Cygwin RDWR fifo?
As always, if you can provide test cases of bugs we will endeavor to fix
problems.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.htm
We are continuing our long drawn out effort to port the SIMPL toolkit
(http://www.icanprogram.com/simpl) to the Cygwin platform. For a long time
we were unable to proceed due to issues with the fifo implementation under
Cygwin. These issues have largely been addressed in more recent Cygwin
12 matches
Mail list logo
