On Mar 6 09:48, jesus san miguel wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Thanks for your answer, but I am using password-less authentication
> too (with public/private keys), so /etc/password is necessary, isn't
> it?
No! Who told you that? As long as you use the user account name
the way it's called in Cygwi
6-1840367147-1613345037-500:/home/Administrator:/bin/bash
> administrator:*:197108:197121:U-SSFE009W2012\Administrator,S-1-5-21-3863157116-1840367147-1613345037-500:/home/Administrator:/bin/bash
>
> #Administrator@SSFE009W2012 /etc
> $ uname -a
> CYGWIN_NT-6.3-WOW SSFE009W2012 2.7.0(0.
On 3/6/2017 4:22 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, jesus san miguel!
>
>> Besides, user alias "miabuela" is working as expected. Why shouldn't
>> "administrator" alias work as well?
>
> That's the worst idea I've heard since morning.
>
It's a legacy idea to allow different users control a pa
500:/home/Administrator:/bin/bash
>>> administrator:*:197108:197121:U-SSFE009W2012\Administrator,S-1-5-21-3863157116-1840367147-1613345037-500:/home/Administrator:/bin/bash
>>
>>> #Administrator@SSFE009W2012 /etc
>>> $ uname -a
>>> CYGWIN_NT-6.3-WOW SSFE009W2012 2
r:*:197108:197121:U-SSFE009W2012\Administrator,S-1-5-21-3863157116-1840367147-1613345037-500:/home/Administrator:/bin/bash
>> administrator:*:197108:197121:U-SSFE009W2012\Administrator,S-1-5-21-3863157116-1840367147-1613345037-500:/home/Administrator:/bin/bash
>
>> #Administrator@SSFE009
ministrator:*:197108:197121:U-SSFE009W2012\Administrator,S-1-5-21-3863157116-1840367147-1613345037-500:/home/Administrator:/bin/bash
> #Administrator@SSFE009W2012 /etc
> $ uname -a
> CYGWIN_NT-6.3-WOW SSFE009W2012 2.7.0(0.306/5/3) 2017-02-12 13:13 i686 Cygwin
> The error I get in windo
nistrator,S-1-5-21-3863157116-1840367147-1613345037-500:/home/Administrator:/bin/bash
#Administrator@SSFE009W2012 /etc
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.3-WOW SSFE009W2012 2.7.0(0.306/5/3) 2017-02-12 13:13 i686 Cygwin
The error I get in windows log is "Failed password for invalid user
administrator&qu
7 matches
Mail list logo