On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 03:23:46PM -0500, Harig, Mark A. allegedly wrote:
> If it is an option, you might consider
> running the Windows 'convert' utility
> to change your filesystem from FAT32
> to NTFS. Your operating system (Win2K)
> support NTFS, of course.
Thanks, but this is also the partition
mber 12, 2002 12:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: FAT32, "lock count exceeded", mutt etc.
>
>
> Looking through the mail archives I can't tell what the
> recommended fix
> is for running mutt/fetchmail/procmail and all on a FAT32
> partition, wrt
>
My mistake, I wasn't using the patched version (/usr/bin versus
/usr/local/bin). The patch seems to work. Thanks.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 09:24:14PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet allegedly wrote:
> Mutt needs two fixes to run on FAT:
> - a fix to Cygwin, included since October.
> - a patch to mutt, see below.
> The mutt maintainer is aware of this patch. I hope it eventually
> will become part of the mutt distribution
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:10:40PM -0500, Scott W Brim wrote:
> Looking through the mail archives I can't tell what the recommended fix
> is for running mutt/fetchmail/procmail and all on a FAT32 partition, wrt
> file locking problems. There was plenty of discussion last summer but I
> can't find
Looking through the mail archives I can't tell what the recommended fix
is for running mutt/fetchmail/procmail and all on a FAT32 partition, wrt
file locking problems. There was plenty of discussion last summer but I
can't find a resolution. So far I've tried CYGWIN=nontsec, and
reconfiguring and
6 matches
Mail list logo
