On Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:12:28, Houder wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 19:09:04, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin"
> wrote:
> > > zero-sized? Irrelevant.
> >
> > It is actually very relevant. Because executing an empty script results in=
> > "success" (exit code 0) -- that creates a
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 19:09:04, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin"
wrote:
> > zero-sized? Irrelevant.
>
> It is actually very relevant. Because executing an empty script results in=
> "success" (exit code 0) -- that creates a false-positive.
Good morning Anton,
Sorry for being bri
> I did read the thread.
Really?
> which you confirmed after the fact.
Oh really? Then read again:
In my initial post that started the entire thread I wrote:
> On Unix, an empty file can only be executed (exit code 0) if there's the "x"
> permission granted.
So what's your deal, exactly?
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 4:16 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
>
>> Which is why, as Ken said, the size is irrelevant.
>
> Which makes your comment irrelevant as well. Read the thread what I was
> responding and to whom before trolling.
I did read the thread. And Ken's comment was e
> Which is why, as Ken said, the size is irrelevant.
Which makes your comment irrelevant as well. Read the thread what I was
responding and to whom before trolling.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: htt
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 3:39 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via wrote:
>
>> But what's your basis for saying that an empty script shouldn't be
>> executable?
>
> I meant it only in the context of the script file lacking the proper "x"
> permission.
> Of course an empty script _with_ such
> But what's your basis for saying that an empty script shouldn't be executable?
I meant it only in the context of the script file lacking the proper "x"
permission.
Of course an empty script _with_ such permissions allowed must be executable,
and it will always complete with exit code 0.
--
P
On 8/6/2019 3:09 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote:
>> zero-sized? Irrelevant.
>
> It is actually very relevant. Because executing an empty script results in
> "success" (exit code 0) -- that creates a false-positive.
You were absolutely right on your first complaint, th
> zero-sized? Irrelevant.
It is actually very relevant. Because executing an empty script results in
"success" (exit code 0) -- that creates a false-positive.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cy
On Aug 6 10:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 6 03:19, Ken Brown wrote:
> > >>> On 8/5/2019 2:18 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin
> > >>> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please consider the following shell session:
> >
> > $ cat dummy.c
> > #include
>
On Aug 6 03:19, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/5/2019 4:39 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> > On 8/5/2019 4:19 PM, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 05.08.2019 um 22:01 schrieb Ken Brown:
> >>> On 8/5/2019 2:18 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin
> >>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please conside
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:18:52, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please consider the following shell session:
>
> $ cat dummy.c
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> return 0;
> }
> $ gcc -o dummy dummy.c
> $ mv dummy.exe dummy
> $ ./dummy
> $ echo $?
> 0
> $ chmod
On 8/5/2019 4:39 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/5/2019 4:19 PM, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>>
>> Am 05.08.2019 um 22:01 schrieb Ken Brown:
>>> On 8/5/2019 2:18 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote:
Hi,
Please consider the following shell session:
$ cat dummy.c
>>
On 8/5/2019 4:19 PM, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>
> Am 05.08.2019 um 22:01 schrieb Ken Brown:
>> On 8/5/2019 2:18 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please consider the following shell session:
>>>
>>> $ cat dummy.c
>>> #include
>>>
>>> int main()
>>> {
>>>
Am 05.08.2019 um 22:01 schrieb Ken Brown:
On 8/5/2019 2:18 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote:
Hi,
Please consider the following shell session:
$ cat dummy.c
#include
int main()
{
return 0;
}
$ gcc -o dummy dummy.c
$ mv dummy.exe dummy
$ ./dummy
$ echo $?
0
$ c
On 8/5/2019 2:18 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please consider the following shell session:
>
> $ cat dummy.c
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> return 0;
> }
> $ gcc -o dummy dummy.c
> $ mv dummy.exe dummy
> $ ./dummy
> $ echo $?
> 0
> $ chmod a-x dummy
Hi,
Please consider the following shell session:
$ cat dummy.c
#include
int main()
{
return 0;
}
$ gcc -o dummy dummy.c
$ mv dummy.exe dummy
$ ./dummy
$ echo $?
0
$ chmod a-x dummy
$ ./dummy
-bash: ./dummy: Permission denied
$ rm dummy
$ touch dummy
$ ./dummy
$ echo $?
0
So Cygwin lets the
17 matches
Mail list logo
