Markus Hoenicka mhoenicka.de> writes:
> That is, no time difference. But why does the network drive affect only
> emacs and not touch?
Try "cat > testfile" or something along these lines that creates a file
without explicitly resetting the timestamp as touch is doing. I think you
should find the
Am 2014-07-31 15:50, schrieb Nellis, Kenneth:
From: Markus Hoenicka
Good catch. We're using roaming profiles here, so my home dir is on
some
network drive. If I re-run the test on a local disc, I get the
following:
That is, no time difference. But why does the network drive affect
only
emac
> From: Markus Hoenicka
>
> Good catch. We're using roaming profiles here, so my home dir is on some
> network drive. If I re-run the test on a local disc, I get the
> following:
>
> That is, no time difference. But why does the network drive affect only
> emacs and not touch?
The primary purpos
At 2014-07-31 15:01, Nellis, Kenneth was heard to say:
From: Markus Hoenicka
Hi,
once in a while make complains that some of my files have timestamps
in
the future. I've investigated a little, and it seems that this affecs
only
You can get this behavior if the files are on a server whose
> From: Markus Hoenicka
>
> Hi,
>
> once in a while make complains that some of my files have timestamps in
> the future. I've investigated a little, and it seems that this affecs only
>
You can get this behavior if the files are on a server whose time is
not syncked to your computer.
--Ken Ne
Hi,
once in a while make complains that some of my files have timestamps in
the future. I've investigated a little, and it seems that this affecs
only files which I save from Emacs. The following script reproduces the
problem (run it in an empty directory, especially sample.txt must not
exist
6 matches
Mail list logo
