From: Achim Gratz
> I said "-exec +", although I concur it was too easy to miss.
Indeed, I overlooked the "+" and was unfamiliar with that option
to find. Glad I asked. Learned something today. Thanx for the
clarification. ☺
--Ken Nellis
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.htm
Nellis, Kenneth writes:
> Really? I always thought the opposite. With -exec, doesn't
> find invoke the command for each single found object? While xargs
> allows a single command to operate on a whole slew of objects.
I said "-exec +", although I concur it was too easy to miss.
> For example:
>
Greetings, Nellis, Kenneth!
>> From: Achim Gratz
>> .. the latter is slightly less efficient and you have to
>> do -print0/-0, but I tend to get it right more easily then the -exec
>> stuff.
> Really? I always thought the opposite. With -exec, doesn't
> find invoke the command for each single fo
> From: Achim Gratz
> .. the latter is slightly less efficient and you have to
> do -print0/-0, but I tend to get it right more easily then the -exec
> stuff.
Really? I always thought the opposite. With -exec, doesn't
find invoke the command for each single found object? While xargs
allows a sin
I find I can reproduce the OP's observations, and the most recent advice
doesn't fix it (although it changes the symptoms):
>From mintty/bash:
639> cd /tmp
641> ls -ld .
drwxrwxr-x+ 1 ht None 0 Dec 13 19:55 ./
640> getfacl .
# file: .
# owner: ht
# group: None
user::rwx
group::r
Brian Inglis writes:
> Remove DACLs Default ACLs also on directories using:
> setfacl -bk ~/.[!.]* ~/.[!.]*/**/ ~/.[!.]*/**/* \
> /???/**/ /???/**/* /sbin/ /sbin/*
> - that takes a while to run, and you may get a few anonymous
> setfacl: Permission denied
> messag
On 2016-12-13 08:20, Ronald Otto Valentin Fischer wrote:
>On 2016-12-13 10:57, Ken Brown wrote:
>> Does this help?
>> https://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#faq.using.same-with-permissions
> While interesting, it seems to describe a different phenomenon.
> Actually, when I create files by Cygwin tool
> Does this help?
>
> https://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#faq.using.same-with-permissions
While interesting, it seems to describe a different phenomenon.
Actually, when I create files by Cygwin tools only (touch, nano, ),
the access rights are always correct. Indeed, even after removing the
On 12/13/2016 5:39 AM, Ronald Fischer wrote:
Does anybody have an explanation for the following strange phenomenon?
When I create Ruby files (*.rb) with an, the files end up with the x-bit
set with some editors, while this does not happen with some other
editors. This is annoying, because when I
Does anybody have an explanation for the following strange phenomenon?
When I create Ruby files (*.rb) with an, the files end up with the x-bit
set with some editors, while this does not happen with some other
editors. This is annoying, because when I use git to put the file in a
repository, and t
10 matches
Mail list logo
