RE: Default Architecture of Package Search/List Pages

2015-09-01 Thread Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
Corinna Vinschen sent the following at Tuesday, September 01, 2015 11:59 AM >On Sep 1 15:50, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: >> Corinna Vinschen sent the following at Tuesday, September 01, 2015 11:35 AM >> >On Sep 1 12:36, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: >> >> On the cygwin packa

Re: Default Architecture of Package Search/List Pages

2015-09-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 1 15:50, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: > Corinna Vinschen sent the following at Tuesday, September 01, 2015 11:35 AM > >On Sep 1 12:36, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: > >> On the cygwin package search and package list pages, the > >> architectures are listed with 32 bit

RE: Default Architecture of Package Search/List Pages

2015-09-01 Thread Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
Corinna Vinschen sent the following at Tuesday, September 01, 2015 11:35 AM >On Sep 1 12:36, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: >> On the cygwin package search and package list pages, the >> architectures are listed with 32 bit first/default. >> >> x86 x86_64 >> >> If it is known that current

Re: Default Architecture of Package Search/List Pages

2015-09-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 1 12:36, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: > On the cygwin package search and package list pages, the > architectures are listed with 32 bit first/default. > > x86 x86_64 > > If it is known that currently the majority of cygwin users are using > 64 bit, might it be appropriate to m

Default Architecture of Package Search/List Pages

2015-09-01 Thread Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
On the cygwin package search and package list pages, the architectures are listed with 32 bit first/default. x86 x86_64 If it is known that currently the majority of cygwin users are using 64 bit, might it be appropriate to make 64 bit the default? Thanks for considering this. - Barry Disclai