Re: Cygwin gcc and g90 compilers...

2005-08-25 Thread Bill Hughes
On 8/23/05, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:30:28PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: ..snip.. > >>Checking up on this posting problem, I see that it is the standard > >>problem with attempting to send html e

Re: Cygwin gcc and g90 compilers...

2005-08-24 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to René Berber on 8/23/2005 4:48 PM: > First, the line above should be written like: > >make -f gcc-mingw.mak "CXXFLAGS_COMMON=-mno-cygwin -I/usr/include/mingw" > > A space between -f and the makefile name. Actually, make, like any oth

Re: Cygwin gcc and g90 compilers...

2005-08-24 Thread Brian Dessent
Juan Carlos Morataya wrote: > I think that I need to Building a native STLport with Cygwin gcc in my > installed system by the mean of > > make -fgcc-mingw.mak "CXXFLAGS_COMMON=-mno-cygwin -I/usr/include/mingw" > > is that correct? There is no need to build STLport, since gcc comes with a full

Re: Cygwin gcc and g90 compilers...

2005-08-23 Thread René Berber
Juan Carlos Morataya wrote: > I think that I need to Building a native STLport with Cygwin gcc in my > installed system by the mean of > > make -fgcc-mingw.mak "CXXFLAGS_COMMON=-mno-cygwin -I/usr/include/mingw" > > is that correct? No. > If so... I do it but my system doesn't found the gcc-mi

RE: Cygwin gcc and g90 compilers...

2005-08-23 Thread Juan Carlos Morataya
I think that I need to Building a native STLport with Cygwin gcc in my installed system by the mean of make -fgcc-mingw.mak "CXXFLAGS_COMMON=-mno-cygwin -I/usr/include/mingw" is that correct? If so... I do it but my system doesn't found the gcc-mingw.mak make file... some idea about this issue

RE: Cygwin gcc and g90 compilers...

2005-08-23 Thread Juan Carlos Morataya
Christopher Faylor Enviado el: Martes, 23 de Agosto de 2005 04:17 p.m. Para: cygwin@cygwin.com Asunto: Re: Cygwin gcc and g90 compilers... On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:30:28PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:28:1

Re: Cygwin gcc and g90 compilers...

2005-08-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:30:28PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:28:17PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >>>It's usually a good idea to try to resolve any posting problem with the >>>list administrator/owner, instead of

Re: Cygwin gcc and g90 compilers...

2005-08-23 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:28:17PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >It's usually a good idea to try to resolve any posting problem with the > >list administrator/owner, instead of sending e-mail to random list > >participants. I'm forwarding this

Re: Cygwin gcc and g90 compilers...

2005-08-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:28:17PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >It's usually a good idea to try to resolve any posting problem with the >list administrator/owner, instead of sending e-mail to random list >participants. I'm forwarding this message to the list, but if you have >trouble posting i

Re: Cygwin gcc and g90 compilers...

2005-08-23 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Juan, It's usually a good idea to try to resolve any posting problem with the list administrator/owner, instead of sending e-mail to random list participants. I'm forwarding this message to the list, but if you have trouble posting in the future, try contacting cygwincom> instead. This top-poste