Hi Corrinna...
> On Oct 28 14:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Whether 1.7 is faster or slower depends on what you're doing and on
what
> > OS you're running. For instance, scanning local directories is about
> > 60% faster in 1.7 while starting lots of processes is about 10% slower
> > on Vist
On Oct 28 14:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 28 12:37, Roland Schwingel wrote:
> > Any clues? I just made an additional test compiling stock
> > libxml2-2.6.32 using the stock gcc3 coming with both cygwin versions
> > and I am coming to roughly the same numbers. Is 1.7 truly slower
> > than 1.
On Oct 28 12:37, Roland Schwingel wrote:
> Any clues? I just made an additional test compiling stock
> libxml2-2.6.32 using the stock gcc3 coming with both cygwin versions
> and I am coming to roughly the same numbers. Is 1.7 truly slower
> than 1.5 or aren't all final optimizations done right now?
Hi...
When evaluating 1.7 I do also conduct some speed tests with cygwin 1.5.
I am using 1.5.25 und 1.7.0-62 on windows xp sp3 32bit here for my tests
on a quad core machine with enough ram.
It seems that 1.7 is around 10-25% slower in my scenarios here. I did
some compilation tests. Each te
4 matches
Mail list logo
