On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 08:20:00AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>On 04/27/2010 08:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> And while we're touching the file, we probably want to do similar
>>> treatment for struct siginfo_t: si_tid, si_overrun, si_sigval, si_value,
>>> si_status, si_utime, si_stime, and si_a
On 04/27/2010 08:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> And while we're touching the file, we probably want to do similar
>> treatment for struct siginfo_t: si_tid, si_overrun, si_sigval, si_value,
>> si_status, si_utime, si_stime, and si_addr.
>
> Does "we" mean you're going to provide a patch?
Yes.
On Apr 27 07:58, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/27/2010 03:05 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Like this? We are already using analog definitions in the socket header
> > files.
>
> Yes, that looks right.
>
> >
> > Index: include/cygwin/signal.h
> > ===
On 04/27/2010 03:05 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Like this? We are already using analog definitions in the socket header
> files.
Yes, that looks right.
>
> Index: include/cygwin/signal.h
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/winsup/cygw
On Apr 26 19:54, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 26/04/2010 17:45, Eric Blake wrote:
> > [this was originally raised on the libvirt list]
> >
> > On 04/25/2010 05:32 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> >> +struct sigaction action_stop;
> >>
> >> -struct sigaction action_stop = {
> >> -.sa_handler
On 26/04/2010 17:45, Eric Blake wrote:
> [this was originally raised on the libvirt list]
>
> On 04/25/2010 05:32 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
>> +struct sigaction action_stop;
>>
>> -struct sigaction action_stop = {
>> -.sa_handler = stop
>> -};
>> +memset(&action_stop, 0,
[this was originally raised on the libvirt list]
On 04/25/2010 05:32 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> +struct sigaction action_stop;
>
> -struct sigaction action_stop = {
> -.sa_handler = stop
> -};
> +memset(&action_stop, 0, sizeof action_stop);
> +
> +action_stop.sa_hand
7 matches
Mail list logo
