Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock')

2005-12-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 13 22:16, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > > > Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > > > > > I just checked this with 20051212 and emacs (not xemacs). > > > > emacs -q > > > > M-x flyspell-mode > > M-x compile > > M-x recompile > > > > For me everything is working fine here. > > > > > I have tried also with

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock')

2005-12-13 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > > I just checked this with 20051212 and emacs (not xemacs). > > emacs -q > > M-x flyspell-mode > M-x compile > M-x recompile > > For me everything is working fine here. > I have tried also with the snapshots 20051212 13:44:06, 20051213 00:12:38 with the same problems:

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock')

2005-12-13 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Angelo Graziosi writes: > With the snapshots 20051212 13:44:06 the problems described previously > remain. > They seem a little worst. I just checked this with 20051212 and emacs (not xemacs). emacs -q M-x flyspell-mode M-x compile M-x recompile For me everything is working

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock')

2005-12-12 Thread Angelo Graziosi
With the snapshots 20051212 13:44:06 the problems described previously remain. They seem a little worst. Best regards, Angelo. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.c

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock')

2005-12-12 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Corinna Vinschen writes: > You *did* read that I checked in a patch this morning which should solve > this, didn't you? > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-12/msg00452.html Yup, xemacs can start subprocesses again with the 20051212 snapshot. > Corinna Thanks Volker -

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock')

2005-12-12 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > > I think the OP means emacs and not xemacs. > Yes, I mean EMACS and not XEmacs! I confirm that the problems described in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-12/msg00441.html are absent with the snapshot 2005.10.24. Ciao, angelo. -- Unsubscribe info: ht

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock')

2005-12-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 12 13:32, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > > Could the xemacs maintainer please have a look into that and break > > this down into something which can be handled by a xemacs ignorant? > > I think the OP means emacs and not xemacs. But xemacs has problems

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock')

2005-12-12 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Corinna Vinschen writes: > Could the xemacs maintainer please have a look into that and break > this down into something which can be handled by a xemacs ignorant? I think the OP means emacs and not xemacs. But xemacs has problems with starting subprocesses as indicated in o http:

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock')

2005-12-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 11 22:44, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > > > The problems described in > >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-12/msg00441.html > > are absent if one uses the snapshot 2005.10.24 12:04:00. > > Those problems appear at least from the snapshot 2005.11.17 and are > present also with the last sna

Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot(was: Emacs and 'alarm clock')

2005-12-11 Thread Angelo Graziosi
The problems described in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-12/msg00441.html are absent if one uses the snapshot 2005.10.24 12:04:00. Those problems appear at least from the snapshot 2005.11.17 and are present also with the last snapshot 2005.12.10. [With the recent snapshots some commands