Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'

2013-07-03 Thread Peter B.
On 03.07.2013 15:30 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jul 3 15:04, Peter B. wrote: >> On 03.07.2013 14:33 Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Jul 3 05:03, Peter B. wrote: On Jun 20 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I'll build a new patch 2.7.1 for 32 bit today. I hope that fixes it > for 32 bi

Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'

2013-07-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 3 15:04, Peter B. wrote: > > On 03.07.2013 14:33 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jul 3 05:03, Peter B. wrote: > >> On Jun 20 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>> I'll build a new patch 2.7.1 for 32 bit today. I hope that fixes it > >>> for 32 bit as well. > >> The new 2.7.1 (32bit) brakes

Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'

2013-07-03 Thread Peter B.
On 03.07.2013 14:33 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jul 3 05:03, Peter B. wrote: >> On Jun 20 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> I'll build a new patch 2.7.1 for 32 bit today. I hope that fixes it >>> for 32 bit as well. >> The new 2.7.1 (32bit) brakes CRLF handling for me completely. The old >> 2.6

Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'

2013-07-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 3 05:03, Peter B. wrote: > On Jun 20 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > I'll build a new patch 2.7.1 for 32 bit today. I hope that fixes it > > for 32 bit as well. > > The new 2.7.1 (32bit) brakes CRLF handling for me completely. The old > 2.6.1 works properly. 2.7.1 with text files conver

Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'

2013-07-02 Thread Peter B.
On Jun 20 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I'll build a new patch 2.7.1 for 32 bit today. I hope that fixes it > for 32 bit as well. The new 2.7.1 (32bit) brakes CRLF handling for me completely. The old 2.6.1 works properly. 2.7.1 with text files converted from CRLF to LF works properly as well.

Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'

2013-06-21 Thread Matt D.
Thank you. I took the time to make certain that I couldn't find any other lingering problems. The update to 2.7.1 corrects the test case I submitted previously. Thanks! :) On 6/21/2013 8:11 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jun 20 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jun 19 23:31, Matt D. wrote:

Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'

2013-06-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 20 09:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 19 23:31, Matt D. wrote: > > I've been looking further into this and it appears as though the > > problem is in 'patch' not 'quilt'. quilt is actually a collection of > > bash scripts and calls patch to do the actual patching. > > > > Using the sam

Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'

2013-06-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 19 23:31, Matt D. wrote: > I've been looking further into this and it appears as though the > problem is in 'patch' not 'quilt'. quilt is actually a collection of > bash scripts and calls patch to do the actual patching. > > Using the same example I provided earlier in the thread, the same

Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'

2013-06-19 Thread Matt D.
I'm building from Linux source from the X2Go git repository. The patches are being applied downstream to the last base nx libraries provided by NoMachine. It can't be helped if the original source has CRLF in this case. I understand that Cygwin is trying to emulate Linux here, but I don't beli

Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'

2013-06-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:31:48PM -0400, Matt D. wrote: >I've been looking further into this and it appears as though the problem >is in 'patch' not 'quilt'. quilt is actually a collection of bash >scripts and calls patch to do the actual patching. > >Using the same example I provided earlier in

Re: Bug with Cygwin's 'quilt' is actually in 'patch'

2013-06-19 Thread Matt D.
I've been looking further into this and it appears as though the problem is in 'patch' not 'quilt'. quilt is actually a collection of bash scripts and calls patch to do the actual patching. Using the same example I provided earlier in the thread, the same error occurs when calling patch direct