Re: Attempting to build cygwin1.dll

2016-08-30 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 30/08/2016 09:34, Nirgendsdorf wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 01:04:23 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-08-29 21:21, Nirgendsdorf wrote: I am sure I have all the support libraries for the 32-bit mingw gcc installed and working (I've built software with it). Does this mean a 64-bit machine

Re: Attempting to build cygwin1.dll

2016-08-30 Thread Nirgendsdorf
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 01:04:23 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-08-29 21:21, Nirgendsdorf wrote: I am sure I have all the support libraries for the 32-bit mingw gcc installed and working (I've built software with it). Does this mean a 64-bit machine is required to build the Cygwin DLL? No;

Re: Attempting to build cygwin1.dll

2016-08-29 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2016-08-29 21:21, Nirgendsdorf wrote: I am sure I have all the support libraries for the 32-bit mingw gcc installed and working (I've built software with it). Does this mean a 64-bit machine is required to build the Cygwin DLL? No; the mingw64 cross-compiler is required for building cyglsa64

Attempting to build cygwin1.dll

2016-08-29 Thread Nirgendsdorf
System details first: "CYGWIN_NT-5.1 GKDC531 2.5.2(0.297/5/3) 2016-06-23 14:27 i686" on Windows XP SP3, on a dual-core Pentium 4 (i786) box. I have rebuilt and optimized gcc and several math libraries with the architecture-specific options of gcc, `-march=native' and `-mfpmath=sse', to get the