At 07:39 2002-10-24, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > >
> > > You're most likely accustomed on your Linux system to "/bin/sh"
> > > being BASH. On Cygwinm /bin/sh is ASH, and it is far more minimal
> > > in its implementation of the POSIX shell standard, and does not
> > >
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > > Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > > >
... snip ...
> > >
> > > While there is an info file on bash, and even a man entry, there
> > > seems to be nothing whatsoever about ash on the system. If we are
> >
> > Put "#!/bin/bash
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > >
> > > You're most likely accustomed on your Linux system to "/bin/sh"
> > > being BASH. On Cygwinm /bin/sh is ASH, and it is far more minimal
> > > in its implementation of the POSIX shell standard, and does not
> > >
> Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >
> > You're most likely accustomed on your Linux system to "/bin/sh"
> > being BASH. On Cygwinm /bin/sh is ASH, and it is far more minimal
> > in its implementation of the POSIX shell standard, and does not
> > provide "==" as an equivalent for "=" in the "test" (a.k.a.
Randall R Schulz wrote:
>
> You're most likely accustomed on your Linux system to "/bin/sh"
> being BASH. On Cygwinm /bin/sh is ASH, and it is far more minimal
> in its implementation of the POSIX shell standard, and does not
> provide "==" as an equivalent for "=" in the "test" (a.k.a. "[")
> bui
5 matches
Mail list logo
