RE: Arbitraily Banning Maintainers From Mailing Lists Which They Need To Perform Their Duties

On 20 April 2006 13:26, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > [Follow-ups set to cygwin@, since the arbitrary banning of maintainers, or "Arbitrary" is not an accurate description of a ban that was done for a clearly-defined reason. Gary, you could have TITTTL'd the thread but you just *had* to have the

Arbitraily Banning Maintainers From Mailing Lists Which They Need To Perform Their Duties

[Follow-ups set to cygwin@, since the arbitrary banning of maintainers, or anyone else for that matter, from Cygwin mailing lists is most certainly of grave concern to the Cygwin community at large.] > From: Christopher Faylor > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 1:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj