Re: An deeper and not before asked question about setup.exe

2002-04-17 Thread Michael A Chase
From: "Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 08:55 Subject: Re: An deeper and not before asked question about setup.exe > Michael A Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's a newer version of clean

Re: An deeper and not before asked question about setup.exe

2002-04-17 Thread Max Bowsher
> >My question is this: _Why_ is it necessary to create mirror-named directories to > >allow the downloading from multiple mirrors? > >I have no doubt it was done for a reason, but I would very much like to know > >that reason. > If you're interested in discussing the design of setup in this area

Re: An deeper and not before asked question about setup.exe

2002-04-16 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
At 05:46 AM 4/16/2002, Max Bowsher wrote: >First, I've read this thread, and others: > > Yes, it is! :) This topic was covered multiple times on the mailing > > list already, see this thread from 4 April: > > Question on the new behavior of setup.exe > >In it, it says: This is done to allow fetchi

An deeper and not before asked question about setup.exe

2002-04-16 Thread Max Bowsher
First, I've read this thread, and others: > Yes, it is! :) This topic was covered multiple times on the mailing > list already, see this thread from 4 April: > Question on the new behavior of setup.exe In it, it says: This is done to allow fetching from multiple mirrors. My question is this: _Wh