Re: A few cygwin issues, mostly for 1.7

2009-03-19 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 03/19/2009, Chris Mirchandani wrote: 2) Could the setup.exe version be posted on the web site? We used to do this but then we got all sorts of posts to this list which showed that people didn't understand that this was the version of the 'setup.exe' program and not the version of the Cygwin

Re: A few cygwin issues, mostly for 1.7

2009-03-19 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Chris Mirchandani on 3/18/2009 10:51 PM: > First the less significant, maybe dumb, questions. In addition to Corinna's answers, please http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTWLL - your long lines are painful to read. > > 5) Any chance we will

Re: A few cygwin issues, mostly for 1.7

2009-03-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTWLL On Mar 19 00:51, Chris Mirchandani wrote: > 1) cygwin release on site is not easy to match using uname or > cygcheck.exe. e.g. On the site the version is 1.5.25-15 and uname -a > returns "CYGWIN_NT-5.1 Family1-d 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 2008-06-12 19:34 If you're ru

A few cygwin issues, mostly for 1.7

2009-03-18 Thread Chris Mirchandani
If some of these can be passed to the devs I would appreciate your help with that as I would prefer those of you that are more experienced with cygwin to make the decision that the request is worth their time. First the less significant, maybe dumb, questions. 1) cygwin release on site is no