Re: RE: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction()

2004-03-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:48:03AM -0500, Larry Hall wrote: >At 10:08 AM 3/25/2004, you wrote: >>On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:37:24PM +, Ghanshyam wrote: >>>Thanks for your attention. But I found the second result (two SIGCHLD) in >>>both the cases. I m using the cygwin version 1.5.5.1 >> >>Give

Re: RE: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction()

2004-03-25 Thread Larry Hall
At 10:08 AM 3/25/2004, you wrote: >On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:37:24PM +, Ghanshyam wrote: >>Thanks for your attention. But I found the second result (two SIGCHLD) in >>both the cases. I m using the cygwin version 1.5.5.1 > >Given that the current version of cygwin is 1.5.10, does that possibly

RE: RE: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction()

2004-03-25 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: 25 March 2004 15:08 > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:37:24PM +, Ghanshyam wrote: > >Thanks for your attention. But I found the second result > (two SIGCHLD) > >in both the cases. I m using the cygwin ver

Re: RE: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction()

2004-03-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:37:24PM +, Ghanshyam wrote: >Thanks for your attention. But I found the second result (two SIGCHLD) in >both the cases. I m using the cygwin version 1.5.5.1 Given that the current version of cygwin is 1.5.10, does that possibly suggest something to you? -- Please us

RE:RE: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction()

2004-03-24 Thread Ghanshyam
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction() > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:24:34PM +, Ghanshyam wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >I found some problem in sigaction() system call with respect to following > >assertions defined in IEE

Re: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction()

2004-03-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:24:34PM +, Ghanshyam wrote: >Hi all, > >I found some problem in sigaction() system call with respect to following >assertions defined in IEEE std 2003.1 -1992 Test methods for measuring >conformance to POSIX-part1 document: When I run NIST-PCTS test suite on >cygwin t

1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction()

2004-03-24 Thread Ghanshyam
Hi all, I found some problem in sigaction() system call with respect to following assertions defined in IEEE std 2003.1 -1992 Test methods for measuring conformance to POSIX-part1 document: When I run NIST-PCTS test suite on cygwin the following assertion failed. 14(C) If the behavior associate