Re: 1.5.21: fork in find/ls failing, simple test case

2006-08-31 Thread Brian Dessent
John Hartman wrote: > Okay, when I stopped the 'Logitech Process Monitor' service the problem goes > away. Thanks for the quick diagnosis. > > I rebased the camera dlls but that does not fix this problem. > > Can you tell me what the root cause is? > > Is there any way to prevent this problem?

Re: 1.5.21: fork in find/ls failing, simple test case

2006-08-31 Thread mwoehlke
John Hartman wrote: Okay, when I stopped the 'Logitech Process Monitor' service the problem goes away. Thanks for the quick diagnosis. [snip] Can you tell me what the root cause is? Logitech's drivers suck? :-) You might want to search the archives for 'logitech', just to see what other pr

RE: 1.5.21: fork in find/ls failing, simple test case

2006-08-31 Thread John Hartman
Okay, when I stopped the 'Logitech Process Monitor' service the problem goes away. Thanks for the quick diagnosis. I rebased the camera dlls but that does not fix this problem. Can you tell me what the root cause is? Is there any way to prevent this problem? I.e., the problem of "foreign" d

RE: 1.5.21: fork in find/ls failing, simple test case

2006-08-31 Thread Dave Korn
On 31 August 2006 16:53, John Hartman wrote: > Using the distribution noted in the attached cygcheck.out, the > following command fails consistently with the results shown: > (Lassen John ~ ) cd /usr > > (Lassen John /usr ) find bin -exec ls {} \; WJFFM, in both tcsh and bash. > I see no dis