"Brian Dessent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm afraid you are probably not going to find anybody on this list
interested in even considering problems with these ancient versions. If
you can reproduce the problem you experience with a current Cygwin
snapshot the
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 05:24:01PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 30 May 2006 17:08, Carry Suryakusuma wrote:
>
>> I have old Cygwin binaries, source codes and build environment for version
>> 1.0. These Cygwin binaries crashed badly on the newer Windows XP and later
>> with Date Execution Protection
Carry Suryakusuma wrote:
> I rebuilt the Cygwin1.dll using the following build environment:
> 1. bash version: GNU bash, version 2.03.0(2)-release (i686-pc-cygwin)
> 2. make version: GNU Make version 3.77, by Richard Stallman and Roland
> McGrath.
> 3. gcc version: 2.9-cygwin-990830
> 4. g++ versi
On 30 May 2006 17:08, Carry Suryakusuma wrote:
> I have old Cygwin binaries, source codes and build environment for version
> 1.0. These Cygwin binaries crashed badly on the newer Windows XP and later
> with Date Execution Protection (DEP) support running on DEP enabled
> processor.
Probably so
Hi,
I am new to this mailing list. If this is not the right mailing address,
please let me know what will be the mailing list.
I have old Cygwin binaries, source codes and build environment for version
1.0. These Cygwin binaries crashed badly on the newer Windows XP and later
with Date Executi
5 matches
Mail list logo