On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 06:14:26PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 05:50:58PM -0400, Benoit Rochefort wrote:
>>
>> As pointed out, that doesn't explain the matter with
>> /usr/bin/test which is also reporting /usr/bin/bash as
>> beeing non-executable.
>>
>That's because /b
Hallo Benoit,
Am Montag, 18. August 2003 um 23:50 schriebst du:
> But you tested on *YOUR* /usr/bin/bash, what is your id and
> the permissions setted on your /usr/bin/bash program? Read
> carefully the output I sent (especially file
> mode/owner/group). May be you can make a similar test on
> an
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 05:50:58PM -0400, Benoit Rochefort wrote:
>
> As pointed out, that doesn't explain the matter with
> /usr/bin/test which is also reporting /usr/bin/bash as
> beeing non-executable.
>
That's because /bin/test is still using stat() instead of access().
Care to fix it?
Pierre
But you tested on *YOUR* /usr/bin/bash, what is your id and
the permissions setted on your /usr/bin/bash program? Read
carefully the output I sent (especially file
mode/owner/group). May be you can make a similar test on
another program that you set the permissions/owner/group as
I have?
As pointe
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 11:28:42PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
> Nope. Seems to be a bug in your perl version. Which version are you
> using right now? I consider the 5.8.0 series will be removed from the
> mirrors soon, I was not very happy with it. 5.6.1-2 will stay and
> eventually be up
Hallo Benoit,
you wrote:
> When I installed cygwin, permissions on all the distribution looks like:
> ###
> $ ls -al /usr/bin/bash
> -rwx--+ 1 Administ Domain U 531968 Mar 13 04:29 /usr/bin/bash*
> ###
When I installed cygwin, permissions on all the distribution looks like:
###
$ ls -al /usr/bin/bash
-rwx--+ 1 Administ Domain U 531968 Mar 13 04:29 /usr/bin/bash*
###
7 matches
Mail list logo
