On 11/27/2015 2:31 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:20:18 +0100
From: Dominique de Waleffe
So... started my homework... Got fresh w10 vm, put cygwin64 and both
versions of emacs 24.4 and 24.5 from fsf ftp onto it
And trying to start bash as shell fails under both version
> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:00:11 +0100
> From: Dominique de Waleffe
> Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com, help-emacs-wind...@gnu.org
>
> Next question is where can I find an official Emacs 64-bit build?
There is none.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://c
Thanks, I'll look in that direction...
Next question is where can I find an official Emacs 64-bit build?
Went to the FAQ, read it at
(https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/efaq-w32/Downloading.html)
it says it should be on the ftp site and there would be both a 32 and
64 bit versio
> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:20:18 +0100
> From: Dominique de Waleffe
>
> So... started my homework... Got fresh w10 vm, put cygwin64 and both
> versions of emacs 24.4 and 24.5 from fsf ftp onto it
>
> And trying to start bash as shell fails under both versions!
>
> => I was mistaken in the
So... started my homework... Got fresh w10 vm, put cygwin64 and both
versions of emacs 24.4 and 24.5 from fsf ftp onto it
And trying to start bash as shell fails under both versions!
=> I was mistaken in the origin of my instance of 24.4 (it must have
come from another source, and I do not r
There never was any reason to do as I have so far always been able to
run a version of Emacs compiled without cygwin without any blocking
issue but still running cygwin tools under emacs (and that has been a
case for a very long time!). I have no religious opinion on this but
I don't see why I sho
Dominique de Waleffe writes:
> Meanwhile, I'll make a VM with a fresh install of Win10 (v1511 x64)
> and just Emacs + cygwin and see whether there is something fishy about
> my current setup after the upgrades it went through...
Is there any reason why you don't use the Emacs that comes with Cygwi
Corinna,
Thanks for the pointer.
I have checked the BLODA list. The only thing I have is windows
defender (part of the os:-(
It can be disabled via group policy. (but I am not tempted to do that
for long term)
I did that but same issue...
I have rebased the whole cygwin as suggested also.
That d
On Nov 25 19:38, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:37:15 +0100
> > From: Dominique de Waleffe
> >
> > bash: cannot set terminal process group (-1): Inappropriate ioctl for device
> > bash: no job control in this shell
> > 1 [main] bash 9588 c:\s\cygwin64\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal e
Before upgrading another machine (still on win7/64), I updated
cygwin64 on it and pulled fsfemacs 24.5 (the existing binary on gnu's
site) on it...
Did the same test there and on win7 it works. Could this be a Windows
10 related issue?
D.
PS: I'll stop cc'ing the emacs list after this message as
> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:37:15 +0100
> From: Dominique de Waleffe
>
> bash: cannot set terminal process group (-1): Inappropriate ioctl for device
> bash: no job control in this shell
> 1 [main] bash 9588 c:\s\cygwin64\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error in forked
> process - fork: can't reserve mem
11 matches
Mail list logo
