Re: [avail for test] ncurses-5.2-8 and libncurses6-5.2-8

Jason Tishler wrote: > Chuck, > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:57:50AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>Request: >> Can somebody verify that they can now build packages without >>-DBROKEN_LINKER when previously that switch was required? >> > > I can successfully rebuild Python 2.2 without -DBR

Re: [avail for test] ncurses-5.2-8 and libncurses6-5.2-8

Chuck, On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:57:50AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > Request: > Can somebody verify that they can now build packages without > -DBROKEN_LINKER when previously that switch was required? I can successfully rebuild Python 2.2 without -DBROKEN_LINKER -- specifically, the _curs

Re: [avail for test] ncurses-5.2-8 and libncurses6-5.2-8

Tadashi Watanabe wrote: >>On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 01:57:50 -0500 >>[EMAIL PROTECTED](Charles Wilson) said: >> > > cwilson>Can somebody verify that they can now build packages without > cwilson> -DBROKEN_LINKER when previously that switch was required? > > I have succeeded in buildi

Re: [avail for test] ncurses-5.2-8 and libncurses6-5.2-8

> On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 01:57:50 -0500 > [EMAIL PROTECTED](Charles Wilson) said: cwilson>Can somebody verify that they can now build packages without cwilson> -DBROKEN_LINKER when previously that switch was required? I have succeeded in building lynx2.8.5dev.7, without -DBROKEN_LINKER

Re: [avail for test] ncurses-5.2-8 and libncurses6-5.2-8

=== - Original Message - From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:57 PM Subject: [avail for test] ncurses-5.2-8 and libncurses6-5.2-8 > I've placed updated versions of these two packages on sour

[avail for test] ncurses-5.2-8 and libncurses6-5.2-8

I've placed updated versions of these two packages on sourceware, but have marked them 'test'. In order to install them, you must use setup and pick the 'Exp'erimental radio button on the chooser. Changes: fix for the BROKEN_LINKER problem. Now, the public headers DO declare that symbol.