Re: [RFU 1.5 and 1.7] subversion-1.6.5-1 and -2

2009-09-09 Thread David Rothenberger
On 9/9/2009 10:33 AM, Thomas Plank wrote: David Rothenberger (daver...@acm.org) wrote: [subversion] For me it seems that you have compiled it on your own. Did it work for you out of the box? I apply about 13 patches to the upstream sources to create the package for Cygwin. Horrible! What a

Re: [RFU 1.5 and 1.7] subversion-1.6.5-1 and -2

2009-09-09 Thread Thomas Plank
David Rothenberger (daver...@acm.org) wrote: [subversion] >> For me it seems that you have compiled it on your own. >> Did it work for you out of the box? > I apply about 13 patches to the upstream sources to create the package > for Cygwin. Horrible! What a pitty, 1.5.6 worked without any patc

Re: [RFU 1.5 and 1.7] subversion-1.6.5-1 and -2

2009-09-08 Thread David Rothenberger
On 9/7/2009 1:41 PM, Thomas Plank wrote: Hi David, Hi Thomas. I'm sending the reply to the cygwin mailing list, too, so others may benefit. Please follow up there. on http://www.mail-archive.com/cygwin-a...@cygwin.com/msg22439.html I saw your mails concerning newer versions of subversion.