On Feb 24 15:28, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> On 23/02/2015 21:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Feb 23 18:15, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> >>I really wanted to do this by adding some DWARF CFI to the generated sigfe.s
> >>file, but there doesn't seem to currently be a way to correctly describe
> >>_sigbe's frame us
On 23/02/2015 21:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 23 18:15, Jon TURNEY wrote:
I really wanted to do this by adding some DWARF CFI to the generated sigfe.s
file, but there doesn't seem to currently be a way to correctly describe
_sigbe's frame using that.
I was wondering about this already.
On Feb 23 18:15, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> I really wanted to do this by adding some DWARF CFI to the generated sigfe.s
> file, but there doesn't seem to currently be a way to correctly describe
> _sigbe's frame using that.
I was wondering about this already. It seems weird if the CFI stuff
doesn't all
I really wanted to do this by adding some DWARF CFI to the generated sigfe.s
file, but there doesn't seem to currently be a way to correctly describe
_sigbe's frame using that.
So instead, write a custom unwinder for _sigbe frames, which gets the return
address from the sigstack.
Implemented for
4 matches
Mail list logo