RE: [OT] RE: cp to flash drive very slow

2004-10-02 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [OT] RE: cp to flash drive very slow > > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > > Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is USB > > > 2.0 with fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell Dimension 4600

RE: [OT] RE: cp to flash drive very slow

2004-10-02 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > >>> Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is USB > >>> 2.0 with fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell Dimension 4600 > >>> which claims eight USB 2.0 connectiors. > >>> Running Windows XP.

RE: [OT] RE: cp to flash drive very slow

2004-10-01 Thread Hughes, Bill
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > >>> Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is >>> USB 2.0 with fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell >>> Dimension 4600 which claims eight USB 2.0 connectiors. >>> Running Windows XP. >> [snip] >> >

[OT] RE: cp to flash drive very slow

2004-10-01 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is > > USB 2.0 with fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell > > Dimension 4600 which claims eight USB 2.0 connectiors. > > Running Windows XP. > [snip] > > (EIGHT USB 2.0 connectors? Wow