* Markus E.L. (Sun, 13 May 2007 17:14:46 +0200)
> Markus Schönhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [manually deleted] wrote:
> >
> >> PS: Brian, I've been living under the impression that we are under the
> >> rule not to include cleartext email addresses in quotes? Is that
> >> still so a
Markus E.L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Markus Schönhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
By hell. My apologies. And with deep regret. etc.
I'll really have to have a look, why that sometimes works and
sometimes not (my address mangling). U
Markus Schönhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [manually deleted] wrote:
>
>> PS: Brian, I've been living under the impression that we are under the
>> rule not to include cleartext email addresses in quotes? Is that
>> still so and would you, please, not burn my address further?
>
> If
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 05:25:22PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>>Dave Korn wrote:
>>>Calm down, calm down, there's no need to panic, cgf isn't stalled! If
>>>you consider that a pause is a kind of break, well, you don't need to
>>>close a tag, do you
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>
> > Calm down, calm down, there's no need to panic, cgf isn't stalled! If you
> > consider that a pause is a kind of break, well, you don't need to close a
> > tag, do you? So you don't need to close a either
>
> I guess the only wa
Dave Korn wrote:
Calm down, calm down, there's no need to panic, cgf isn't stalled! If
you consider that a pause is a kind of break, well, you don't need to
close a tag, do you? So you don't need to close a either
I guess the only way to be sure is to pass cgf through the proper validator!
Chri
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: 24 September 2004 15:37
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:31:17AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> >Calm down, calm down, there's no need to panic, cgf isn't stalled! If
> >you consider that a pause is a kind of break, w
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:31:17AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>Calm down, calm down, there's no need to panic, cgf isn't stalled! If
>you consider that a pause is a kind of break, well, you don't need to
>close a tag, do you? So you don't need to close a either
Sometimes it is like Dave Korn is re
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Robb, Sam
> Sent: 23 September 2004 19:24
> > >
> > > Hmm. I wonder if I just replaced all of the '@'s with a png
> > of an '@',
> > > if that would foil the spammers.
> > >
> > > Nope. Wouldn't work for the text archives.
> > >
>
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Generally speaking, no measure is completely spam-proof, except
complete erasure of e-mail addresses (which will conflict with any
other legitimate use of "@" on the list). Spamming is more or less an
industry now, and one can imagine an industrious spammer (or spam
har
> >
> > Hmm. I wonder if I just replaced all of the '@'s with a png
> of an '@',
> > if that would foil the spammers.
> >
> > Nope. Wouldn't work for the text archives.
> >
>
> Sorry, been working on standards compliance of my web site
> but it seems
> to me that you left off the closing !
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
_Now_ is it on-topic?
:-)
I have to point out that I'm getting spam to some new accounts which
have only been used to send email to mailing lists which munge
addresses with the "me at cgf dot cx" method, so this
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:44:28AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> >>>Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40
> >>
> >>>On Thu,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:44:28AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
>>>Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40
>>
>>>On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
_Now_ i
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Igor Pechtchanski
> > Sent: 23 September 2004 17:43
>
> > > > You mean, like "`banner -c@ @`"? ;-)
>
> ISTM that http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#YOWTWYWT !
>
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /win/c/> `banner -c@ @`
> > > bash: :
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Pechtchanski
> Sent: 23 September 2004 17:43
> > > You mean, like "`banner -c@ @`"? ;-)
ISTM that http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#YOWTWYWT !
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /win/c/> `banner -c@ @`
> > bash: : command not found
> >
> > AAARRRGHGHGHGHG!!!1!!
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Umm, given the subject, this is particularly vile. :-D
> > Sent: 23 September 2004 16:44
>
> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> >
> > > > -Original Message-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 September 2004 16:44
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> > > Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40
> > >
> > > H
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> > Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40
>
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> > >_Now_ is it on-topic?
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > I have to point out that I'm
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> >_Now_ is it on-topic?
>
> :-)
>
> I have to point out that I'm getting spam to some new accounts which
> have only bee
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> >From http://www.cdt.org/speech/spam/030319spamreport.shtml
>
> " Major Findings
>
> Our analysis indicated that e-mail addresses posted on Web sites or in
> newsgroups attract the most spam.
> Web Sites - CDT received the most e-mails when an address was p
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>_Now_ is it on-topic?
:-)
I have to point out that I'm getting spam to some new accounts which
have only been used to send email to mailing lists which munge addresses
with the "me at cgf dot cx" method, so this isn't foolproof.
Hmm.
>From http://www.cdt.org/speech/spam/030319spamreport.shtml
" Major Findings
Our analysis indicated that e-mail addresses posted on Web sites or in
newsgroups attract the most spam.
Web Sites - CDT received the most e-mails when an address was placed visibly
on a public Web site. Spammers use
23 matches
Mail list logo
