Re: [Bug] tmux 3.2-0

2021-06-05 Thread Achim Gratz
ASSI writes: > It _might_ be possible for this particular case that one could open > /proc/${clientpid}/fd/1 and have it do the right thing. If so, then the > call just above that clobbers stdin with the ttyname would probably be > better off as /proc/${clientpid}/fd/0. To paraphrase Douglas N. A

Re: [Bug] tmux 3.2-0

2021-06-04 Thread ASSI
Michael Wild via Cygwin writes: > I just uploaded a patched test version 3.2-1 (yeah, I know, I'm off by > one with the release number...). Can you give it a go and see whether > the mosh test suite runs through with it? No it doesn't and I don't even understand why anybody thinks that would fix t

Re: [Bug] tmux 3.2-0

2021-06-02 Thread ASSI
Michael Wild via Cygwin writes: > I just uploaded a patched test version 3.2-1 (yeah, I know, I'm off by > one with the release number...). Can you give it a go and see whether > the mosh test suite runs through with it? I'll have a look, but it'll probably at the weekend. Regards, Achim. -- +<

Re: [Bug] tmux 3.2-0

2021-06-02 Thread Michael Wild via Cygwin
> > [...] > > As I said in the original posting, the test suite for mosh makes use of > > control mode. > > [...] I just uploaded a patched test version 3.2-1 (yeah, I know, I'm off by one with the release number...). Can you give it a go and see whether the mosh test suite runs through with it?

Re: [Bug] tmux 3.2-0

2021-06-02 Thread Michael Wild via Cygwin
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 8:30 PM Achim Gratz wrote: > > Michael Wild via Cygwin writes: > > Just out of curiosity: is this a critical feature for you? E.g. are > > you automating tmux with it? Because as far as I understand control > > mode is intended for integration with terminal emulators. And so

Re: [Bug] tmux 3.2-0

2021-05-31 Thread Achim Gratz
Michael Wild via Cygwin writes: > Just out of curiosity: is this a critical feature for you? E.g. are > you automating tmux with it? Because as far as I understand control > mode is intended for integration with terminal emulators. And so far, > iTerm2 on Mac is the only one implementing the protoc

Re: [Bug] tmux 3.2-0

2021-05-31 Thread Michael Wild via Cygwin
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 12:08 PM ASSI wrote: > > Michael Wild via Cygwin writes: > > Sorry for the mistake with the release number. Should that be a sanity > > check in calm? > > I personally don't think so, if you want to do a test / pre-release then > starting with a "0" seems netural to me. > >

Re: [Bug] tmux 3.2-0

2021-05-26 Thread ASSI
Michael Wild via Cygwin writes: > Sorry for the mistake with the release number. Should that be a sanity > check in calm? I personally don't think so, if you want to do a test / pre-release then starting with a "0" seems netural to me. > As for the problem with the control mode: Is there anything

Re: [Bug] tmux 3.2-0

2021-05-25 Thread Michael Wild via Cygwin
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:02 PM Achim Gratz wrote: > > Achim Gratz writes: > > Michael Wild via Cygwin-announce via Cygwin writes: > >> The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: > >> > >> * tmux-3.2-0 > > > > [nit] > > General releases should be numbered starting with 1

[Bug] tmux 3.2-0

2021-05-25 Thread Achim Gratz
Achim Gratz writes: > Michael Wild via Cygwin-announce via Cygwin writes: >> The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: >> >> * tmux-3.2-0 > > [nit] > General releases should be numbered starting with 1. > > Is the control mode working as intended and if yes, is there a w