Re: [BUG] inter-process signaling of non-special signals breaks

2002-02-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > If so, please create a simple testcase. Apache is somewhat big for > a small testcase, isn't it? yes Corinna it is. But the problem is at the first run it seems everything runs fine and then at some point (which I can't predict and even worst can't recreate) the signal

Re: [BUG] inter-process signaling of non-special signals breaks

2002-02-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 09:31:50AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Corinna, it would be great if you could investigate this signaling > issue. I'm hardly guessing it's a problem to Cygwin even up to the > latest release. First check with 1.3.9 if it's still an issue. We had some signal related bug fi

Re: [BUG] inter-process signaling of non-special signals breaks

2002-02-14 Thread Stipe Tolj
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 01:12:14PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Ok, this issue has been addressed by me a couple of times, so I hope > > you core Cygwin developers don't get borred from me. > > > > The bug (maybe it's fixed now, but it has been detected at least from >

Re: [BUG] inter-process signaling of non-special signals breaks

2002-02-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 01:12:14PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Ok, this issue has been addressed by me a couple of times, so I hope > you core Cygwin developers don't get borred from me. > > The bug (maybe it's fixed now, but it has been detected at least from > 1.3.1 up to 1.3.7) arises from my w

[BUG] inter-process signaling of non-special signals breaks

2002-02-13 Thread Stipe Tolj
Ok, this issue has been addressed by me a couple of times, so I hope you core Cygwin developers don't get borred from me. The bug (maybe it's fixed now, but it has been detected at least from 1.3.1 up to 1.3.7) arises from my work on Apache for Cygwin. Here is the main problem scope: apache's m