On 06/19/2018 10:18 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 19.06.2018 um 11:53 schrieb JonY:
>> On 06/18/2018 12:12 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>> Am 06.06.2018 um 21:13 schrieb Stefan Weil:
Both mingw64-x86_64-icu-57.1-1 and mingw64-x86_64-icu-57.1-2 are broken:
This code always fails:
i
Am 19.06.2018 um 11:53 schrieb JonY:
> On 06/18/2018 12:12 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Am 06.06.2018 um 21:13 schrieb Stefan Weil:
>>> Both mingw64-x86_64-icu-57.1-1 and mingw64-x86_64-icu-57.1-2 are broken:
>>>
>>> This code always fails:
>>>
>>> icu::Normalizer2::getInstance(nullptr, "nfkc", UNORM2
On 06/18/2018 12:12 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 06.06.2018 um 21:13 schrieb Stefan Weil:
>> Both mingw64-x86_64-icu-57.1-1 and mingw64-x86_64-icu-57.1-2 are broken:
>>
>> This code always fails:
>>
>> icu::Normalizer2::getInstance(nullptr, "nfkc", UNORM2_COMPOSE, error_code);
>>
>> The problem was
Am 06.06.2018 um 21:13 schrieb Stefan Weil:
> Both mingw64-x86_64-icu-57.1-1 and mingw64-x86_64-icu-57.1-2 are broken:
>
> This code always fails:
>
> icu::Normalizer2::getInstance(nullptr, "nfkc", UNORM2_COMPOSE, error_code);
>
> The problem was detected when comparing Tesseract for Windows
> e
Both mingw64-x86_64-icu-57.1-1 and mingw64-x86_64-icu-57.1-2 are broken:
This code always fails:
icu::Normalizer2::getInstance(nullptr, "nfkc", UNORM2_COMPOSE, error_code);
The problem was detected when comparing Tesseract for Windows
executables: while the 32 bit version worked fine, the 64 bit
5 matches
Mail list logo