Re: [BUG] Nasty bug persists on x86-64

2014-09-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 2 11:06, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello Corinna! > > > Try `bt' at this point. Maybe the backtrace shows something of > > interest. > > You haven't read the message completely. 'bt' cannot help since > there's no debug information for ntdll and gdb is unable to unwind > the stack correct

RE: [BUG] Nasty bug persists on x86-64

2014-09-02 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello Corinna! > Try `bt' at this point. Maybe the backtrace shows something of > interest. You haven't read the message completely. 'bt' cannot help since there's no debug information for ntdll and gdb is unable to unwind the stack correctly. > Apart from that, try the latest snapshot from

Re: [BUG] Nasty bug persists on x86-64

2014-09-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 1 18:14, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! Another update has been published and i still experience random > crashes on x86-64. > At this point i managed to go a little bit farther in my research. The > problem reproduces best with 'sh --version' command. At first glance it > seems to work OK m

[BUG] Nasty bug persists on x86-64

2014-09-01 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello! Another update has been published and i still experience random crashes on x86-64. At this point i managed to go a little bit farther in my research. The problem reproduces best with 'sh --version' command. At first glance it seems to work OK most of the time, but take a look at strace's o