On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Peter A. Castro
> > > Sent: 30 March 2004 19:45
> >
> > > The original issue was with the executable /usr/bin/zsh being
> > > a link to the
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Peter A. Castro
> > Sent: 30 March 2004 19:45
>
> > The original issue was with the executable /usr/bin/zsh being
> > a link to the real exe (eg: zsh-4.2.0). However, this is not
> > a packagi
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Peter A. Castro
> > Sent: 30 March 2004 19:45
>
> > The original issue was with the executable /usr/bin/zsh being
> > a link to the real exe (eg: zsh-4.2.0). However, this is not
> > a packagi
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Peter A. Castro
> Sent: 30 March 2004 19:45
> The original issue was with the executable /usr/bin/zsh being
> a link to the real exe (eg: zsh-4.2.0). However, this is not
> a packaging error, IMHO. /usr/bin/zsh is a *hardlink*,
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, David Rayner wrote:
> Peter,
Greetings David,
> There is a posting in Gmane which explains that it's a packaging error
> >Sounds like a packaging bug.
Well, I am the Cygwin maintainer for zsh, and there are two issues:
The original issue was with the executable /usr/bin/zs
6 -0800 (PST)
From: "Peter A. Castro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: zzapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: zsh-4.2.0-1
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:07:00 -0500 (EST), Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >
> > >Sounds like a packaging bug.
> >
> > And right you are:
> >
> > $ cat /etc/postinstall/zsh.sh.done
> > #!/bin/sh
> >
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:40:23PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> >On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
> >> > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:40:23PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
>On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Peter A. Castro wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
>> > > >On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (ES
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
> > > >On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:07:00 -0500 (EST), Igor Pechtchanski wrote in
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >Sounds like a packaging bug.
>
> And right you are:
>
> $ cat /etc/postinstall/zsh.sh.done
> #!/bin/sh
> V=4.1.1
> ^^^
> Should be 4.2.0
Oh,
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
> >
> > >On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
> > >
> > >>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
> > >>at a mirror nea
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
> >
> >>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
> >>at a mirror near you real soon.
> >>
> >Hi I saw zsh 4.2.0 download this morn
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:07:00 -0500 (EST), Igor Pechtchanski wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Sounds like a packaging bug.
And right you are:
$ cat /etc/postinstall/zsh.sh.done
#!/bin/sh
V=4.1.1
^^^
Should be 4.2.0
prefix=/usr
infodir=${prefix}/share/info
[snip]
# Install default zprofile i
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:07:00 -0500 (EST), wrote:
>
>What's weird is the fact that running "zsh" showed version 4.1.1. Even
>with the symlink this should not have happened. I assume running
>"zsh-4.2.0" would show version 4.2.0, right? It would be interesting to
>see if you have other copies o
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
> >
> >>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
> >>at a mirror near you real soon.
> >>
> >Hi I saw zsh 4.2.0 download this morn
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
>
>>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
>>at a mirror near you real soon.
>>
>Hi I saw zsh 4.2.0 download this morning when I ran my daily setup
>however (having reset
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
>at a mirror near you real soon.
>
Hi I saw zsh 4.2.0 download this morning when I ran my daily setup
however (having reset my PC as requested)
zsh --version
zsh 4.1.1 (i686-
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>
> > * Peter A. Castro (2004-03-26 18:10 +0100)
> > > BTW, I've tried many, many ways to reproduce your original hang
> > > problem but am still unable to do so.
> >
> > One last try: I have recently set op
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Peter A. Castro (2004-03-26 18:10 +0100)
> > BTW, I've tried many, many ways to reproduce your original hang
> > problem but am still unable to do so.
>
> One last try: I have recently set option "autocd"[1]. Now when I type
> something like "adksfaj"
* Peter A. Castro (2004-03-26 18:10 +0100)
> BTW, I've tried many, many ways to reproduce your original hang
> problem but am still unable to do so.
One last try: I have recently set option "autocd"[1]. Now when I type
something like "adksfaj" the delay (~ 10 seconds) is the same like
with the cor
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Peter A. Castro (2004-03-26 16:09 +0100)
> > An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
> > at a mirror near you real soon.
>
> Thank you.
Your welcome.
BTW, I've tried many, many ways to reproduce your original hang pro
* Peter A. Castro (2004-03-26 16:09 +0100)
> An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
> at a mirror near you real soon.
Thank you.
Thorsten
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Do
An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
at a mirror near you real soon.
This release has many bug fixes related to memory leaks, the Zle editor
and updates to various completion macros. All in all worth upgrading to
if you've experienced any problems lately. Lates
24 matches
Mail list logo
