On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:39:33AM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>* Ren? Berber (2006-06-18 23:22 +)
>> Linda Walsh wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>Vim 7 seems to still have a few kinks to work out and doesn't
>>> seem nearly as stable as vim64. Since vim7 is already out as vim,
>>> maybe vim6.4 could
* René Berber (2006-06-18 23:22 +)
> Linda Walsh wrote:
> [snip]
>>Vim 7 seems to still have a few kinks to work out and doesn't
>> seem nearly as stable as vim64. Since vim7 is already out as vim,
>> maybe vim6.4 could be made available as a separete vim6 or vim64
>> package for those not
Linda Walsh wrote:
[snip]
>Vim 7 seems to still have a few kinks to work out and doesn't
> seem nearly as stable as vim64. Since vim7 is already out as vim,
> maybe vim6.4 could be made available as a separete vim6 or vim64
> package for those not wanting to be on the bleeding edge?
It is ava
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.0.017-1.
This is the long awaited vim 7.0, latest patchlevel 17. Cygwin Vim
still builds from the vanilla sources.
---
Vim 7 seems to still have a few kinks to work out and doesn't
seem nearly as stable as vim64
I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.0.017-1.
This is the long awaited vim 7.0, latest patchlevel 17. Cygwin Vim
still builds from the vanilla sources.
The official release message:
===
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMpr
5 matches
Mail list logo
