It seems that git send-email is in the git-email package,
not installed by default when installing git ...
Regards - EM
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:
On 2016-08-25 08:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 25 08:38, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2016-08-25 02:07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
You don't need mailx, btw. After you created your patch with
`git format-patch', you can send it with `git send-email' :)
Looked for that, and everything there, but:
On 08/25/2016 09:38 AM, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> You don't need mailx, btw. After you created your patch with
>> `git format-patch', you can send it with `git send-email' :)
>
> Looked for that, and everything there, but:
>
> $ uname -srvmo
> CYGWIN_NT-10.0 2.5.2(0.297/5/3) 2016-06-23 14:29 x86_64
On Aug 25 08:38, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2016-08-25 02:07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > You don't need mailx, btw. After you created your patch with
> > `git format-patch', you can send it with `git send-email' :)
>
> Looked for that, and everything there, but:
>
> $ uname -srvmo
> CYGWIN_NT-10.
I agree -- my git has no "send-email" command.
The "format-patch" commands looks useful in this
context, however. (My git is cygwin got, by the way!)
Cheers -- Eliot Moss
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
On 2016-08-25 02:07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 24 14:47, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2016-08-24 12:29, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 24 11:30, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2016-08-24 02:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 23 23:36, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2016-08-23 22:15, Brian Inglis wrote:
On
On Aug 24 14:47, Brian Inglis wrote:
>
> On 2016-08-24 12:29, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Aug 24 11:30, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > > On 2016-08-24 02:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > On Aug 23 23:36, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > > > > On 2016-08-23 22:15, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > > > > > On 2016-08-2
On 2016-08-24 12:29, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 24 11:30, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2016-08-24 02:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 23 23:36, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2016-08-23 22:15, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2016-08-23 10:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 23 07:27, Brian Inglis wrote:
Comp
On Aug 24 11:30, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2016-08-24 02:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Aug 23 23:36, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > > On 2016-08-23 22:15, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > > > On 2016-08-23 10:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > > On Aug 23 07:27, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > > > > > Compared lists
On 2016-08-24 02:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 23 23:36, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2016-08-23 22:15, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2016-08-23 10:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 23 07:27, Brian Inglis wrote:
Compared lists of locale_t headers and functions for POSIX, Cygwin,
and glibc, attached
On Aug 23 23:36, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2016-08-23 22:15, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > On 2016-08-23 10:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Aug 23 07:27, Brian Inglis wrote:
> > > > Compared lists of locale_t headers and functions for POSIX, Cygwin,
> > > > and glibc, attached below for comparison, a
On 2016-08-23 22:15, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2016-08-23 10:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 23 07:27, Brian Inglis wrote:
Compared lists of locale_t headers and functions for POSIX, Cygwin,
and glibc, attached below for comparison, and found:
* missed string.h(strerror_l) on my first check;
On 2016-08-23 10:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 23 07:27, Brian Inglis wrote:
Compared lists of locale_t headers and functions for POSIX, Cygwin,
and glibc, attached below for comparison, and found:
* missed string.h(strerror_l) on my first check;
not sure if you can implement that easil
On Aug 23 07:27, Brian Inglis wrote:
> Compared lists of locale_t headers and functions for POSIX, Cygwin,
> and glibc, attached below for comparison, and found:
>
> * missed string.h(strerror_l) on my first check;
>not sure if you can implement that easily on Windows?
>
> * GNU also supports
On 2016-08-20 15:37, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I uploaded a new Cygwin test release 2.6.0-0.11.
(Still) two interesting changes in this test release:
- Fix the bug reported in
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-08/msg00357.html
- Add missing nl_langinfo_l functions as reported in
https://cygwin.
Hi folks,
I uploaded a new Cygwin test release 2.6.0-0.11.
--
I managed to build the 2.6.0-10 package from the wrong sources, so
here's the fixed 2.6.0-0.11. Sorry about that!
---
16 matches
Mail list logo
