Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.33-0.8

2014-11-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 10 12:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 7 16:16, Tim Prince wrote: > > > > On 11/7/2014 4:11 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > > > - GCC 4.9.2-1 DLLs accidentally call __cxa_atexit with the wrong DSO > > > handle value. This Cygwin update allows this scenario throughout. > > > It

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.33-0.8

2014-11-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 7 16:16, Tim Prince wrote: > > On 11/7/2014 4:11 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > - GCC 4.9.2-1 DLLs accidentally call __cxa_atexit with the wrong DSO > > handle value. This Cygwin update allows this scenario throughout. > > It now understands *any* DSO handle value, as long as it'

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.33-0.8

2014-11-09 Thread David Stacey
On 07/11/2014 09:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote: I just released a 8th TEST version of the next upcoming Cygwin release, 1.7.33-0.8. I've done a little testing, and the only casualty so far seems to be the bash post install script. If you perform a clean install of Cygwin (x86 or x86_64) and inst

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.33-0.8

2014-11-07 Thread Tim Prince
On 11/7/2014 4:11 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > - GCC 4.9.2-1 DLLs accidentally call __cxa_atexit with the wrong DSO > handle value. This Cygwin update allows this scenario throughout. > It now understands *any* DSO handle value, as long as it's a pointer > into the DSO's address space. >

[ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.33-0.8

2014-11-07 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Cygwin friends and users, I just released a 8th TEST version of the next upcoming Cygwin release, 1.7.33-0.8. Changes compared to the former test version 1.7.33-0.7: - GCC 4.9.2-1 DLLs accidentally call __cxa_atexit with the wrong DSO handle value. This Cygwin update allows this scenario